Skip to main content

another nail in the coffin of Racing NSW

Racing NSW supremo, or should I say, head muppet, Peter V'Landys, has banked his reputation and the future of the NSW racing industry on winning the race fields legislation against Betfair and corporate bookmakers in Australia. The issue - paying for the right to use Racing NSW information to take bets on NSW racing. Nobody is disputing the fact that the body that runs the show deserves to be paid by companies making money from it. The issue is how much and what is fair.

Australia has two main states of racing - Victoria and New South Wales. NSW might have a bigger population but their racing isn't on a par with Victoria. When Takeover Target won last weekend on Doncaster Handicap day, it was a feat worthy of being cheered on by 40,000 people at least. They didn't even get 20 thousand on Sydney's second or third biggest raceday of the year - pathetic.

Racing Victoria sets the standard in Australia - better prizemoney, bigger fields, better crowds, racing not as dominated by two stables, and a greater chunk of the betting (38% v 28%). Racing Victoria consulted a few lawyers who knew their stuff and decided they couldn't charge whatever they wanted for their racing data. They couldn't discriminate in favour of their good friend Tabcorp (now employing an equally incompetent muppet called Robert "I will cancel the spring carnival if it means keeping Betfair out of Australia" Nason, ex-Racing Victoria CEO), they had to set a fee which was equitable to all and not a rate which would automatically send some competitors they weren't in bed with broke.

Racing Vic went for a gross profits fee from betting firms, rather than a turnover tax which not only defies every other business model in the world, but also heavily favours the fat margins, auto profits of Tabcorp. Was this the outcome they wanted? Not a chance, it was what the law demanded. You cannot exclude competition by charging a fee favourable to your mates, and not to the companies you don't like.

This week, the Australian High Court brought down a ruling that copyright over data which isn't particularly valuable is worthless.

Racing Copyright on Thin Ice

The author of this article knows his business law and how it fits with racing. Owners and other stakeholders in NSW racing should be screaming at this idiot V'Landys to stop pissing money up the wall and get on with it. The betting firms are willing to pay a fair fee, but he's more interested in going to court in the vain hope that he and his band of cronies will be proved correct against anyone who has bothered to read the relevant legislation. Racing NSW has already applied to have the case thrown out, which was laughed off by the court and costs were imposed on Racing NSW. You'd think that might ring some alarm bells, but no. The NSW court has also criticised them heavily for not meeting deadlines in responding to the court action.

The chances of Racing NSW winning this case?

Racing NSW win - 10.00
Racing NSW lose - 1.05

Betfair have run rings around every crusty old body in Australia who have tried to force them out by favouring the monopoly. Don't these idiots understand the importance of recent form??

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…