Skip to main content

Wimbledon Day 1 - bring it on

As posted earlier, my outright previews are available, check Friday's post for the links.

Match comments:

Not overly confident about any match today so make of these what you will...

Almagro has a bigger power game than Monaco, so should be better suited to grass of the two claycourters.

Garcia Lopez is ridiculously short for a battle of two Latinos, but Calleri has had enough of tennis, expected to retire soon. The £12k R1 loser's cheque will pay for a few things in retirement.

Karantantcheva was destined for stardom before she got done for steroids (at the age of 15!). Looked very strong in qualifying from all reports, could go a few rds here although Kleybanova goes well on grass.

Mannarino is a French leftie who prefers fast indoor courts. Should go ok here, but Gicquel is an ironman for stamina, loves winning in five sets.

Kulikova has been dogged by injury and illness for a few yrs. She's only 20 and is highly rated by Russian tennis folk. Sprem has won two ITF titles indoors this year, this will be a decent match.

Barrois hits the ball hard, beat some decent players at Rosmalen last week. Zheng was a surprise semi-finalist here last year, but grass record isn't nothing more than average apart from that.

Santiago Gonzalez is a tall Mexican who loves hardcourts, hits it hard, came through qualifying. Sela had shown no form at all on grass before last week.

Dementieva is pretty short for someone who lost R1 at Eastbourne last week, with her first set being 6-0. Kudryavtseva beast Sharapova here last year (her shoulder was in a bad way though) and almost beat Venus the year before. She seems to fire up here and could be a live chance at odds.

Larcher de Brito looks overs against Zakopalova who dominated in quals, but simply ain't that good. The screeching Portuguese teenager is a top 10 player in the making, something the Czech never had a chance of doing.

Robredo has a shocking record on grass. The qualifier he faces isn't much good but if it becomes a mental battle and he starts remembering previous disasters here...

Karlovic has lost his past four R1 matches here, and the kid he is playing has five won events at lower levels this year. If he can take Karlovic into a fourth and fifth set, the big man will wilt.

Llodra has the perfect game for grass but a shocking record. He's playing a Brit who is no better than average, but he has a pretty solid serve, if he can hold that consistently, Llodra has to withstand the pressure.

Montanes is utter rubbish away from clay - has won just three matches of 22 in Grand Slams not called the French Open. But the guy he faces isn't that crash hot either.

Wickmayer is on fire this year and I've done very well out of her, but I think she has come up rather short against Vesnina who has halved her ranking this year.

Dushevina looked good at Eastbourne last week, really giving the ball a whack against Petrova, then won on retirement. Got blown away by Wozniak in the next round though. She faces Cornet who has had a horrid run lately, but she did appear quite relaxed amongst the crowd at Eastbourne last week. Perhaps she's out to some value now.


So no strong tips today, will probably just stick to trading in-running, looking for players who go too short too soon (market over-reacting to an early break of serve).

For daily injury and fitness updates, visit this PuntingAce forum thread

Comments

  1. About to write my own post, but a couple of things struck me from reading yours -

    i. Wickmayer, like Tanasugarm and Dancevic, got turned over after last week's efforts. I've been looking for the benefits of grass court form, but is the formula I'd use for the rest of the year ( don't back last week's winner ) more important?

    ii. I think Wimbledon's slower paced than s'Hertegenbosch or Queens. I think Montanes, Robredo, Martin etc probably will still get demolished on the really fast courts, but have Wimbledon slowed it down to give these guys a chance?

    iii. From seeing Kudryatseva at Edgbaston, she's more of a bunny boiler than Dementieva!

    ReplyDelete
  2. i - Wickmayer did face a very handy player, thought she came up too short as I alluded to. The other two were a surprise. Betting against the previous week's winners works most other weeks, why not here.. especially as they get no concession re starting date, like they would at regular tour events.

    ii - the grass changed to a harder, slower variety several yrs ago. The weather also plays a part. During Queen's & Birmingham week, it was raining. It hasn't rained since, making the courts harder, higher bounce etc

    iii - a significant % of the women's tour have mental issues

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla