Skip to main content

Wimbledon day 2 action

Another day without any real inspiration, but a few favourites with queries over them...

Dokic - wins this easily if fit, unfortunately that's half the battle for her.

Hanescu have come in for steady support against Navarro. He doesn't have much of a game for grass and the Spaniard did play well at Rosmalen last week, but we saw several players (Dancevic, Tanasugarn, Wickmayer) with great form from last week crumble yesterday.

Kvitova hasn't done much on grass before but has good results indoors and on carpet. Kirilenko just ain't much good away from clay, 1-6 here. Kvitova first-up after ankle injury though.

Sevastova came through qualifying well and I've been following her progress closely all year. She has bit of a future I think and the Bondarenko sisters are incredibly inconsistent.

Voegele is a handy player and faces Venus Williams on centre court. Struggle to see her winning, but Venus often has a bit of a wobble in R1. Games handicap or to win first set might be worth a play here. I've backed her to win first set at 8.5.

Dimitrov is destined for stardom and plays Kunitsyn who isn't that great. But the kid (reigning junior champ) already has his knees taped, bit of a concern.

I was impressed with Istomin at Queen's and Eastbourne but he has come up quite short against Fognini who will give him a battle, despite a poor grass history.

Melzer 3-0 has been backed off the boards today. Odesnik just doesn't bother with grass, only one previous match on the surface. Melzer has been receiving treatment for a back injury recently though.

Chakvetadze is a headcase and crumbles under any form of pressure. Lisicki is a very good player, just yet to find her feet on grass. I think she can push her today.

Keothavong surely can't lose like a normal British woman today against a very poor player in Patricia Mayr.

Pavel has shortened into favouritism against lucky loser Alves. Hmm, who to back - a bloke with chronic back problems or a bloke with a shocking grass record and couldn't even get through a run of poor opponents in quals? Leave me out...

Some people have been tipping C.Rochus today to beat Cuevas, f&#$ knows why. He's gunning for eight straight R1 losses here! Cuevas at least took a set off Dent in qualifying, his first-ever recorded grass tournament.

Gulbis is my lay of the day. Having a woeful year, just 9-16 win loss, apparently focusing on long-term strength and fitness rather than winning matches. Which means his coordination and touch will be out of whack, particularly since he's a shotmaker rather than a grinder. The Italian qualifier has plated a lot of lower level events on grass before, it's a big step up for him, but at least we know he loves the surface.

Stepanek is reportedly OK after a recent ankle injury. His record here has been OK but I think he has come up a little short against Falla, a left-handed Colombian who has gone well here over the years. Could be a shock here.

Kiefer playing Santoro for the tenth time, trails 3-6 on h2h but has won three in a row. Concern is whether he is fit after abominal injury in Halle a fortnight ago. Market seems to suggest he is fine.

Ferrero v Youzhny looks a tight one. I lean to the Russian mostly due to his consistency here over the years. Should be a good match to trade, can see it going the distance.

I've backed Ghedin, Lisicki, Voegele (win first set) and Sevastova today.

Good luck!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T