Skip to main content

Ladbrokes head back to Gibraltar

No surprise here, if Hills decided to go, it was 1.03 that Ladbrokes would go too, despite the Magic Sign running a big 'Bet British' campaign within the last 12 months. The website only made £55m last year so they have to run off to Gibraltar and dodge tax and levy.

Ladbrokes.com to relocate to Gibraltar

I can't see myself ever working for a big company again, I'm too much of an idealist. If you've read my blog for a while, you'll be aware I'm currently studying an MBA. Corporate greed really shits me. If this was a case of remaining viable, then fair enough but it has nothing to do with it. Hills and Ladbrokes are deserting the UK for, in the words of that Nationwide ad, 'have more bubbly for the shareholders'.

They're not the only ones though...

Comments

  1. You seem to be falling into the trap of that stupid advert - demonising 'shareholders' as something evil.

    They are the owners of the business, they entitled to have the business do what is best for them!

    Yes, as a cusomer you have a right to walk away, and as a comentator you have a right to pass comment, but please stop this ridicouls 'shareholders' nonsese as if it is some birth priveledge we are talking about. You wouldn't talk about a business owner like that, but when you apply the 'shareholder' label it seems ok?

    What have they done? - They have moved their business to elsewhere (within the EU) for financial reasons. This has been going on for years, look at the number of businessses that relocated from the UK to Ireland, or the car plants and other manufacturing that moved from the UK to eastern europe.

    We have a choice, we either demand a level playing field, which is fare for the countries. Or we allow an internal market competion wihtin the EU - which is better for the consumer.

    It is a balancing act. Sadly what keeps the balance working is the movement of compaies as it triggers reviews and rebalaning.

    While I may live in Gibraltar, I do not work in the industry!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You mean there is something in Gibraltar besides the betting industry?

    I make no bones about hating corporate greed and their lack of business ethics. The greed of bankers and their 'duty to shareholders' is why the world economy is so utterly screwed. These firms are making more than healthy profits, so it has nothing to do with viability like a manufacturing firm. They are just doing it to avoid tax and levy. Often in these cases, if the people who made the decisions were actually the ones who owned the business, their decisions would be different. Richard Branson talks about when he floated Virgin as it being one of the worst decisions he ever made, and having to buy it back for peace of mind.

    Racing exists for bookmakers and punters, and in the UK, we have a sport/product which is poorly funded already. The shareholders excuse sinks the boot in even further. The government will have to do something, but I can't see it being for the better of the racing industry.

    Like I said, I'm an idealist. It mightn't sit well with city boys but it allows me to sleep soundly at night.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T