Skip to main content

Racing for Change - good, bad or so-so?

Today's feature article in the Racing Post is all about the new project board charged with reinvigorating racing in Britain - Racing for Change. On the one hand, it is something the industry needs to drive it forward. On the other, it's a body full of chairmen and bigwigs who have had a big say in getting the industry where it is now.

Some of the proposals:

- Identifying key fixtures to clearly emphasise start and finish of premier Flat season

Doesn't the Lincoln at Doncaster, soon followed by the Craven meeting at Newmarket already mark the start of the season? The Champions Day meeting at Newmarket virtually finishes the season already.

- Create new showcase finale, to crown the champions of the Flat season

The likes of Ballydoyle and Godolphin control racing in Britain because they pick and choose where their horses run (and how those races are run) in order to create more commercial value for their breeding operations. The champions are unlikely to run a dozen times in the season, and unless the season finale races can immediately gain better breeding value than the likes of the Breeders' Cup or Prix de L'Arc de Triomphe, they'll have a hard time getting the best fields possible. However, the Arc is just one race (with some decent support races) and the Breeders' Cup only has a handful of turf races - but as those racing nations are both Tote only, their prizemoney will always be much higher. Will a finale to the season kill off all the decent level racing in the month before that meeting?

- Focus on creating Premier fixtures, with more Group 1 races on Saturdays through flat season

Of all the times of year to spread racing throughout the week, I'd have thought summer was the best time to have quality racing on more than just Saturdays. Kids are on holidays, a lot of firms take summer breaks and long summer days make great days out. Making the big meetings bigger just locks more punters out and pushes admission prices up - because racecourses are all commercial entities and will try to optimise their takings against supply and demand. Saturday should be the premier day for most of the season - but there is no harm in having decent cards of lesser Pattern racing (G3, Listed) on a Saturday because during the week, a Festival has been at Ascot, Goodwood or York. The only excuse to focus on Saturdays is if the emphasis is on quality rather than quantity all year round, and industry participants are given a day off racing - say a Monday.

- Development of idea for new team-based championship, at handicap level on summer Saturdays

Why? Who is going to be cheering for it? Team-based riding from Ballydoyle is already annoying enough.

- New premier jumps championship for which horses would be required to qualify to compete in feature races at Cheltenham Festival

The only benefit I see in this is forcing the horses who haven't been any good for years to reach a standard so they aren't dangerous in the field, or taking up a spot that could go to a better horse. That one owner from France who keeps putting his slow horses in the Champion Hurdle and Gold Cup is the one I mean. This idea would need cooperation from Ireland to make it float.

- Strengthen link between Cheltenham and the Grand National meeting

Perhaps someone else could tell me what it's currently lacking? If the racecourses can agree to keep the meetings three weeks apart, does it need much else? They are very different tracks and a lot of horses will run well at one venue and not the other. And the number of Cheltenham winners who back up and win at Aintree is not high - the Festival takes a lot out of them.

These are the main ideas listed. I have some of my own, so I'm not going to just sit back and sledge these guys for having a go at a very difficult project. I'll let people digest these while I thrash out my ideas a little more and post them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…