Skip to main content

Racing for Change - solution one

The image of racing.

Look at racing in the media and what do you get? A lot of old faces with little appeal to the younger generation or non-racing followers.

Case in point - John McCririck. Failed bookmaker, failed punter, know-it-all, sexist bigot and regularly tarnishing the image of the sport with his 'They knew' comments. All that does is add to the negative connotations of the industry from people that barely follow it. That racing is for old people. That racing is corrupt. That racing is an old boys club. How many people have a clue what he is doing when waving his arms about? How many under the age of 45? How many under the age of 30? What other industry would allow one of its frontmen to be so politically incorrect at a time where racing is desperate for a higher profile?

I'm not a fan of Matt Chapman but a lot of people are. He does have an opinion, he does come across well on camera and he is not on the wrong side of 50.

Hayley Turner looked good on camera during her time out of the saddle, perhaps there is another woman out there capable of fronting the coverage, rather than just looking at hats and frocks.

Racing needs a positive image and good role models out there. Luke Harvey mentioned the abruptness of Mick Kinane recently in refusing an interview after a race. Make it like football and other big sports - give media training to all jockeys and trainers, and require them to give interviews at certain times, punishable with a fine. It is in their best interest to grow the sport - the more people that follow it, the more money ends up in the prize fund. Focus on the positives, the rest of the media will make it their business to find the negatives. Talk up Barney Curley's charitable efforts in Africa (I know there are several others, I just can't think of any more off the top of my head), the emergence of new stars, what has happened to some retired horses - showjumping, working for the police force etc to show they don't all go to the glue factory.

Emphasise quality over quantity. Not every horse ever bred deserves a race to run in. If they are too darn slow, they do not belong on a race track. Too much of a good thing puts everyone off. One day off occasionally is not necessarily a bad thing, or just rotate the balance - flat (all-weather) racing during the winter should be limited, just as National Hunt racing during the summer should slow down. It does not help the grand scheme of things when horses running out of season are bottom-class. Thin it out, punters only have so much money to spend.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…