Skip to main content

wowser American judges kill off Delaware sports betting

So Delaware had a great idea to bring in legalised sports betting. After all, if Vegas is doing it, and other states like Oregon have it via a 'sports lottery', then why not Delaware? Particularly when the state is struggling with the recession like the rest of the world.

Well, the state government approved it, then the nosey sports leagues ganged up on them and got it shut down. It defies all logic. Legalised and licensed gambling enables sporting authorities to have a money trail, so they can detect any attempted corruption and fraud. If you leave it to the illegal bookies in bars and on street corners, the ones who they will never be able to get rid of, then there is no means of detection. It's all underground and grubby. Legalising one or two state-licensed venues, which would have been taxed enough to keep the margins no more attractive than the outlaws in the Caribbean or on the street corner, and you have an audit trail. It's not as if these firms are going to let players on for unlimited amounts - go to the extent of max bet $1000 or something to keep check of the potential social issues (which are always overstated but in a conservative nation like the US you have to start somewhere - casinos and slots which never stop are far more dangerous and provide 95%+ of problem gamblers) and appease the sports bodies who are paranoid of gambling affecting their games.

Do they really think professional players who get millions to sit on the bench all season will be tempted by the small amounts a gambler could get on with a government-licensed firm? Better to bring them into the spotlight and monitor it instead of let them go unchecked betting with underground bookies, the ones prepared to send the boys around if you don't pay up or do what you're told, or the 'outlaws' in the Caribbean. Who was behind Hansie Cronje, Tim Donaghy, the Chicago Blacksox, the lights being shut down at West Ham, Salim Malik, etc etc? Everyone of them was with unlicensed bookies. Licensed bookies have too much at stake to get involved - their own money and their licence.

Judges kill Delaware sportsbetting - single-game wagering denied

So instead the judges let them bet minimum three-game parlays or trebles to the rest of the world. Wow, that's about as exciting as watching paint dry. Still, it's Americans we are talking about here - they thought George Bush machs I and II was a good idea....

Comments

  1. That's a bit harsh on Americans.

    Perfectly true, just a bit harsh....

    ReplyDelete
  2. hope some one challenges again
    cheers
    easwaran
    India

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…