Skip to main content

Morning racing at Kempton

Short article in today's Racing Post about Kempton and Channel 4 discussing Saturday morning racing, as early as 8.40am to coincide with the Morning Line programme.

What do you think? I can't see the harm in trying. Obviously it won't be for everyone and I doubt you'll see any Group races, but that's much as the same as Wednesday night on the polytrack anyway. Betting shops are open, a lot of folks are up and about at that hour and it might even be easier in traffic around that area. And industry people are up ridiculously early anyway.

It might crash and burn, it might prove a master stroke - either way I think it's worth a go especially if there is terrestrial TV coverage behind it. Being able to spend the night before looking at a proper formguide (as is the norm back in Australia) is a huge plus from me.

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Comments

  1. I have to totally disagree with you about this being a good idea.

    Firstly racing is in the afternoon for a good reason, because those in the industry in terms of the training of horses are at 'work' in the morning. Between 8am and 9am most yards will be out with second lot on the gallops. They will still be working horses that didnt go out in first lot and therefore it is essential that the trainers are at home. Hence why they rarely get Trainers on the Morning Line. Further more most jockeys have to go to the trainers yards to ride work. They can't be in 2 places at once. Thirdly and most importantly the stable staff already work crazy hours for little reward. Think of the logistics in being at the races before 8am. They would have to start off in the middle of the night and more likely the night before and stay over in Kempton. That means more costs for owners as the race day expenses are far more having to pay for at least 2 stable staff to be away from home at night.

    Then there is the fact that they tried a lunch time fixture before and that was a complete flop. A lot of people will have been out on Friday night and won't be up early on Saturday. Furthermore Saturday mornign tends to be the day that families go out for things such as shopping etc.

    I just cant see this working for so many reasons. I hope they don't waste money trying it out!

    ReplyDelete
  2. All those were reasons why we shouldn't race on Sunday or in the evening. Not everyone is the same - punters, trainers etc. Variety and trying different things is good for society - otherwise we'd still be stuck in the dark ages. You're not going to see Howard Johnson come down from Newcastle to race... but there are plenty of trainers close enough to be able to do it. After all, quite a few tracks have Breakfast with the Stars gallops and people turn up them...

    Nobody turns up to night meetings as it is, so this is hardly going to break the bank. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Congrats on your new baby!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T