Skip to main content

laying the field at Windsor



One of the most popular search phrases for this blog is 'lay the field' which was one of the fun strategies we used to demonstrate regularly at our Betfair Education sessions. It's been a while since I've made a post about it so today I've decided to have a go and post an example of how it works.

Quite simply, we are looking for at least two horses to trade short in-running, with a jackpot occurring if even more do (there have been races where four horses have traded at 1.15 or shorter, my favourite was the day at Worcester when I had three matched at 1.34 and not the winner because it was never in front until the line).

In this example I have gone for the double lay - laying £20 at 1.45 on all runners (worst-case scenario -£9 if one horse hits the front and isn't challenged) and then again for £88 at 1.07 (risking another £6.16). Worst-case scenario of -£15.16. The second lay at 1.07 is for the jackpot, when one trades really short, but also not risking enough to wipe out all of the profit when two are matched at 1.45 (£11).




To set up all the lay bets, the simplest way is via the Gruss Betting Assistant. It will cost you £6/month to subscribe. If that's too much for you, then realistically, you shouldn't be betting in the first place.

You can set up all the lays manually on Betfair which isn't a problem in small fields but not much fun on today's 24 runner handicaps at The Curragh. Set the amount you wish to risk via the Liability link - click up comes box, input the amount, click OK and the stakes are set. Then if you are doing this before the race, make sure you select the Keep option!

Is this guaranteed to work? Absolutely not. There is no gambling plan in the world which is guaranteed to work. Will it make you rich long term? Highly unlikely. Will it send you broke short term? Highly unlikely. But you will have a lot of fun doing it. Just bear in mind that all systems are prone to losing streaks, and laying odds-on shots is particularly likely to have that. But on the other hand, you can have days with three 1.03 shots beaten and spirits are high once again :)

Why did I choose 1.45 and 1.07? No reason really, feel free to choose your own numbers. The lower you go, the less likely you are to get matched but the jackpot will be higher. The higher the price, the more chance you have of getting matched, but a losing streak suddenly becomes more costly. There is no compulsion to stick to just odds-on laying either. The maths is simple - match 2 at less than 2 for a profit (assuming level stakes), 3 at less than 3, etc. I know of guys who will do it in golf tournaments laying the field at 6, looking for at least six players to matched at that price. I'd probably avoid it when Tiger is playing though...

Experiment with the price, the stake, which types of races (class, venue, distance, odds of favourite etc) and learn more about how the markets work. Some tracks will work better than others. And there's no reason why it won't work on other sports, you just have to understand when and why the prices move to do it successfully.

Feel free to ask questions in the comments, the longer this post gets the less likely people are to read it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

The Cup review

James McDonald feels the emotion of winning the Melbourne Cup on Verry Elleegant. (photo credit Darrian Traynor/Getty Images) With every man and his dog doing Cup previews these days, perhaps a postmortem of the race provides more value - at least for these more serious about the game or want something to refer back to in 363 days' time. It was great to see Flemington basking in the warm spring sun, with no threat of rain which buggers up the confidence you have in the state of the track, an integral part of betting on horses. The crowd was back, at least about 10% of the normal Cup day crowd, but 10,000 more than were allowed last year. Let us never have to deal with these restrictions again in our lifetimes. The TV coverage - well, um, ugh. On Derby Day, I was able to watch the racing.com stream in the UK while Sky Sports Racing kept to their normal NSW-controlled Sky Racing Aus coverage which denies that Victoria and South Australia exist. For Cup Day, they switched to the Chann