Skip to main content

a revolution is brewing in tote betting

News this morning that the New Zealand Racing Board, which controls the NZ TAB, has signed a deal with Australian based software company, Media and Gaming, developer of Typhoon Pools, to deliver its new totalisator betting platform. Most totalisator and pari-mutuel platforms are old technology, locked into maximum size fields (Aus TABs), slow calculation of dividends (UK Tote), problems with co-mingling and dividend displays (US)etc. This announcement could signal the first radical change to tote betting systems in many years.

NZ Racing selects Typhoon Betting platform

“Tote operations throughout the world run on legacy systems that do not enable them to compete against more technologically advanced gaming enterprises. This is holding racing back in its attempts to match other forms of global entertainment,” said Nicholas Plowman, MD of Media & Gaming. “TyphoonÒ goes a long way to solving these problems.”

Mr. Plowman identified several key advantages of the new TyphoonÒ betting system.

* TyphoonÒ is significantly cheaper to acquire, operate and maintain.
* TyphoonÒ is extremely fast, secure and reliable.
* TyphoonÒ is capable of handling an unlimited number of contestants, events, pools and customer accounts.
* TyphoonÒ runs 24/7
* TyphoonÒ handles multi-language and multi-currency international co-mingling.
* TyphoonÒ provides an improved ability to manage problem gambling issues through greater real-time visibility and reporting.
* TyphoonÒ will enhance an organisation’s existing products and introduce new products in a fast and efficient process.

Andrew Brown, Chief Executive of NZRB, said: “As part of our modernisation strategy, the NZRB conducted a worldwide search for the most efficient and reliable betting platform and TyphoonÒ was selected as the best and most cost-effective option.


Further comment here from Bill Saunders

Typhoon Blows Away the Opposition

Most totalisator operators worldwide have handled the transition to internet wagering very poorly. Early attempts simulated the activities of telephone operators keying bets called to them over the phone, taking little advantage of the benefits that internet operation provided.

...

Racing administrators worldwide recognise and encourage the commingling of wagering pools as a way of attracting bigger punters and international interest in their racing.

Given that they have a common obsession with wagering as the major source of funding their operations, it seems odd that the racing industry is prepared to tolerate partnerships with wagering operators whose systems are so primitive.

The combination of poor wagering systems and entrenched monopolies such at TabCorp which have no incentive to upgrade means that the racing industry is stuck with a glacial rate of change for any wagering innovation.

Comments

  1. What does this mean for us Kiwi punters?. To be honest I find the NZ TAB website to be one of the easiest and friendliest to use. Does this mean that the NZ TAB will be offering more betting from around the world in a similar manner to Australia's centerbet?

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd say it just means their system will be scalable - they can add more markets, quicker, be more flexible, run a tote market on the Grand National or Royal Ascot races with more than 24 runners (assuming they have the same limitations as the Aus TABs). Remember what you see on the outside (effortless and smooth) may be nothing like how it works on the inside.

    Certainly means they will have more racing coverage, SkyRacing Aus and the Sth African channel are working hard on 24hr coverage, and there's no reason at all why a risk-free business like a TAB shouldn't be able to operate 24/7 online. And it also improves their options re co-pooling with overseas firms, on NZ racing and vice-versa.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…