Skip to main content

dithering idiot tries to protect his monopoly

No, it's not Robert Nason, the former CEO of Racing Victoria, who has recently resigned from Tabcorp and moved onto Telstra, oft nominated for the most stubborn company in Australia, it's Dr Friedhelm Repnik claiming that match-fixing would never occur if German citizens were only allowed to bet via his company.

Challenge to Baden-Württemberg Monopoly Rejected

The Chief Executive of Germany’s Baden-Württemberg Lotto company, Dr. Friedhelm Repnik, has called on the government to close illegal betting shops and step up the fight against European online betting providers, suggesting that the recent match-fixing scandal in German football is the result of such ‘uncontrolled’ betting.

Repnik’s comments followed a ruling last week by the Administrative Court of Baden-Württemberg, in an appeal against a cease and desist order issued against private betting shops which allegedly brokered sports bets for betting companies licensed in Gibraltar and Malta.


It's not the European-licensed firms you have to worry about idiot, it's the firms in the Far East who have no qualms about betting on under-16 fixtures, and move prices according to the money, rather than closing down winning or crooked accounts, that are just a tad more concerning. But of course, making sure nobody wins by setting over-rounds of 120% on a football match is a surefire way of stopping anyone betting who might want to win!

Meanwhile, in other self-serving, monopolistic behaviour, the Dutch goverment monopoly which argued that placing an online bet with them was e-commerce, while placing an online bet with Betfair or any other betting site was e-gaming (!), face their court judgment tomorrow. Betfair's Mark Davies has already come out and said he doubts logic will prevail here as the normal three-month period of translation for Dutch court rulings such as this one has been expedited down to just six weeks - so either they've brought in a lot of translators on work experience, or the judgment was already decided before the court case in November...

Comments

  1. Hi Scott, It's always interesting to read your views on these legal issues, to be honest they go over my head! Is the whole of Europe and the USA against online betting exchanges? As the legal systems in each EU country are brought into line, is it likely that the UK would also have to legislate against them? The way the USA shut down the customers of the big Poker sites basically overnight is quite scary. What do you reckon, is Betfair safe?!?!? MG

    ReplyDelete
  2. No chance of the UK legislating against betting firms - it is a major industry there. The US didn't suddenly ban online poker, they just suddenly started to enforce the existing bans on online gaming. France is the only country to have specifically banned betting exchanges, the others are opposed to online sports betting completely.

    The EU says online gambling is legal and have instructed all member states to allow and regulate it - but the various countries with existing government-owned monopolies will take as long as they possibly can in order to protect what they already have.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Funny that the DFB (German FA) have themselves said that commercial sports betting in the country would mean fighting fraud and match fixing an awful lot easier - see http://tiny.cc/RwLZs (German Language). This chap is protecting his own back, nothing more, as his company would be screwed if they were actually allowed some decent competition!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…