Skip to main content

Do your homework!

A costly lesson yesterday for a Betfair in-running layer at Lingfield, where the winner in one race was matched at 1000 for £66. A late change in colours made it difficult, but as I used to stress to people in BF Education classes, use the period just before the race to confirm the colours, as often the shades in the paper or online guide are out, or there could be a late change of ownership, a damaged set of silks needed replacing or the owner has managed to leave that at home.

But the killer in this case was in the detail, as written in the Racing Post..... The winning horse was the only grey in the event, undoubtedly the most distinguishing factor in a race!
Labels:

Comments

  1. Mark9 March 2010 at 21:39

    Hi Scott

    Like you said a very expensive mistake and the way to avoid such a terrible loss could be as easy as doing a simple check before the race.

    I think that sometimes when we are in the thick of the betting/trading action it can be easy to overlook the simple and retrospectively obvious actions that can have a massive influence on our betting banks.

    Thanks for a very useful post

    Mark

    ReplyDelete
  2. Betfree24710 March 2010 at 00:22

    Ouch,

    I noticed in the T20 a week last Sunday that West Indies (who lost) had been backed all the way down to £1.01 in running to beat Zimbabwe.

    Between 1.05 and 1.01 around half a million pounds had been matched, I thought then that quite a few people would have been stung, but I would be surprised if anyone topped the £66,000 mark.

    Bets of it was, Zimbabwe won quite easily in the end!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Scott10 March 2010 at 11:38

    Yes, you're right Betfree247. I would have posted about that one but couldn't find a record of the matched volumes. No doubt there will be more soon...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Betfree24713 March 2010 at 13:41

    Scott, I just noticed it in-running, I should have took a screen shot of it.

    As you know well yourself, they would have been backed all the way down (not just starting at 1.05), so the amounts lost on West Indies would have been massive.

    Just to let you know I wasn't one of them (this time, anyway).

    Always keep an eye on cricket though as you can get some batting collapses with the likes of West Indies, New Zealand and sometimes England.

    For example, just recently England were 1/20 on Betfair in-running against Bangladesh in the 2nd ODI.

    England needed (approximately) 65 runs off 60 balls with 5 wickets remaining, runs to ball was easy, it was the wickets that was the problem, sure enough a few overs later and Bangladesh went (briefly) odds on favourite.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Scott13 March 2010 at 13:44

    I think Deccan went 1.03 yesterday in opening IPL game, didn't catch the early one today.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur
14 comments
Read more

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also,
Post a Comment
Read more

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...
33 comments
Read more