Skip to main content

Do your homework!

A costly lesson yesterday for a Betfair in-running layer at Lingfield, where the winner in one race was matched at 1000 for £66. A late change in colours made it difficult, but as I used to stress to people in BF Education classes, use the period just before the race to confirm the colours, as often the shades in the paper or online guide are out, or there could be a late change of ownership, a damaged set of silks needed replacing or the owner has managed to leave that at home.

But the killer in this case was in the detail, as written in the Racing Post..... The winning horse was the only grey in the event, undoubtedly the most distinguishing factor in a race!

Comments

  1. Hi Scott

    Like you said a very expensive mistake and the way to avoid such a terrible loss could be as easy as doing a simple check before the race.

    I think that sometimes when we are in the thick of the betting/trading action it can be easy to overlook the simple and retrospectively obvious actions that can have a massive influence on our betting banks.

    Thanks for a very useful post

    Mark

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ouch,

    I noticed in the T20 a week last Sunday that West Indies (who lost) had been backed all the way down to £1.01 in running to beat Zimbabwe.

    Between 1.05 and 1.01 around half a million pounds had been matched, I thought then that quite a few people would have been stung, but I would be surprised if anyone topped the £66,000 mark.

    Bets of it was, Zimbabwe won quite easily in the end!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, you're right Betfree247. I would have posted about that one but couldn't find a record of the matched volumes. No doubt there will be more soon...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scott, I just noticed it in-running, I should have took a screen shot of it.

    As you know well yourself, they would have been backed all the way down (not just starting at 1.05), so the amounts lost on West Indies would have been massive.

    Just to let you know I wasn't one of them (this time, anyway).

    Always keep an eye on cricket though as you can get some batting collapses with the likes of West Indies, New Zealand and sometimes England.

    For example, just recently England were 1/20 on Betfair in-running against Bangladesh in the 2nd ODI.

    England needed (approximately) 65 runs off 60 balls with 5 wickets remaining, runs to ball was easy, it was the wickets that was the problem, sure enough a few overs later and Bangladesh went (briefly) odds on favourite.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think Deccan went 1.03 yesterday in opening IPL game, didn't catch the early one today.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…