Skip to main content

FIFA once again prove they are out of touch

Is there any other sport ruled by a bunch of more overpaid, self-righteous pompous gits out of touch with the modern day? We see cheating pricks like Thierry Henry cost the Republic of Ireland tens of millions of pounds because the referees couldn't see what every person and every camera in the stadium could. We see Birmingham today beaten in an FA Cup quarter-final because the blind bastard posing as assistant referee couldn't spot what was blatantly obvious from the same position - daylight between the goalpost and the ball as it crossed the line. If it was Pompey in the same position, it could have spelt the end of the club. In amateur days, it mightn't have made much of a difference. This is when what happened on the field, stayed on the field, all the players shook hands and had a drink together after the game. The game is a long, long way from that in 2010. Poor decisions can cost players, teams and countries millions, and hoping the guilty player will hold his hand up and admit a foul or that it was a goal? You've got more chance of finding the Loch Ness monster.

Goal line technology ruled out

What is the problem? "We should not have technology in the game" - referees wear microphones, players wear boots designed by companies spending millions on research and development, stadia and pitches are built and maintained using state-of-the-art technology. And we're certainly not using the heavy leather balls they used in the 50s. If you don't want technology in the game, then don't let people watch it at home on TV - make them go to the game. It's there already, use it!

Worried about delays? Oh, give us a break - look at what happens in rugby or tennis. It's done quickly and the crowd build up tension waiting for it.

'We want the game to stay the same at all levels' - Oh, get real. Junior football is nothing like professional football. Grandstands, change rooms, advertising everywhere, overpaid prats who shag their teammates' wives/partners, referees who get abused and surrounded by these overpaid prats when they don't agree with a decision, diving..... do we really want these at all levels of the game? The best of a sport deserves the best it can have - the best players, the best venues, the best referees (is there such a thing?), the best technology... When you have fans who are willing to start fights/kill each other over results, isn't in the public interest to remove any doubt or room to attack the referees?

What's stopping the FA/Premier League going out on their own here? Are FIFA going to sanction them? Fat chance. For good or bad, the world now revolves around Premier League football and even FIFA aren't stupid enough to ignore that.

The comment from FIFA about how wonderful it is that people are still talking about the 1966 'was it or wasn't it a goal' in the final is stupid, as you'd expect from them. They're not debating the goal, it's just English fans clinging onto the memories of the only thing they have ever won!

Time for a league to bite the bullet and tell FIFA to piss off. FIFA is irrelevant to the club game anyway.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

Betdaq.... sold...... FOR HOW MUCH???

So as rumoured for a while, Ladbrokes have finally acquired the lemon, sorry, purple-coloured betting exchange, Betdaq. For a mind-boggling €30m as 'initial consideration'. That's an even more ridiculous price than Fernando Torres for £50m, or any English player Liverpool have purchased in recent seasons! As I've written previously there are no logical business reasons for this acquisition. from Nov 29, 2012 The Racing Post reported this week that Ladbrokes are nearing a decision to acquire Betdaq. This baffles me, it really does. Betdaq are a complete and utter lemon. Their only rival in the market has kicked so many own goals over the years with the premium charge, followed by an increase in the premium charge, cost of API and data use, customer service standards which have fallen faster than Facebook share value, site crashes and various other faults. So many pissed off Betfair customers, yet Betdaq are still tailed off with a lap to go. Around the world, Betfair

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...