Skip to main content

the first regulated sports investment fund?

I toyed with doing something like this a few years ago but never took it any further. It was always going to need the backing of a financial group to get it off the ground.

Regulated sports betting fund unveiled

Investors seeking uncorrelated, “economy-proof” returns are being offered a new asset class – trading on sports betting exchanges.

The Galileo Fund, which will be launched this week by London-based Centaur Corporate, claims to be the world’s first regulated such vehicle.

It will trade in sports such as football, racing and tennis on Betfair and other online exchanges that facilitate so-called in-running betting, hosting markets on events already in progress.


Good luck to them, I'd much prefer to invest my money in a fund like that, than one susceptible to major crashes in the economy.

ADDENDUM

But are they the right company to launch such a fund? I believe this is the same firm that dabbles in teaching people to trade. Having done that for a few years with Betfair, that's a precarious position to be in, teaching people to eliminate risk but also to make an earn out of it for the business. My Education programme was criticised by Harry Findlay in a Racing UK interview once (words to the effect of "they'd be much better off being taught by me to be a gambler"), and to an extent I agreed with his but a company can't go out and encourage punters to take risks, then sit back and take the profits as said punters go broke. There's an ethical balance between whetting someone's appetite to go their own way and learn more, and just forcing it down their throat and having to deal with complaints when they inevitably got it wrong due to going back to their old, unprofitable habits.

Centaur have also been known for glossy sales pitches and over the years they have also been a tipping and syndication service, and fell foul of the Advertising Standards Authority at one stage...

CentaurGlobal

ASA judgment

Again, good luck to them, but they need to be more transparent if they are to succeed in the financial world. Still a small investment with one's eyes wide open to the risks wouldn't be such a bad thing, but he who takes out a second mortgage for it is asking for trouble...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

The Cup review

James McDonald feels the emotion of winning the Melbourne Cup on Verry Elleegant. (photo credit Darrian Traynor/Getty Images) With every man and his dog doing Cup previews these days, perhaps a postmortem of the race provides more value - at least for these more serious about the game or want something to refer back to in 363 days' time. It was great to see Flemington basking in the warm spring sun, with no threat of rain which buggers up the confidence you have in the state of the track, an integral part of betting on horses. The crowd was back, at least about 10% of the normal Cup day crowd, but 10,000 more than were allowed last year. Let us never have to deal with these restrictions again in our lifetimes. The TV coverage - well, um, ugh. On Derby Day, I was able to watch the racing.com stream in the UK while Sky Sports Racing kept to their normal NSW-controlled Sky Racing Aus coverage which denies that Victoria and South Australia exist. For Cup Day, they switched to the Chann