Skip to main content

the first regulated sports investment fund?

I toyed with doing something like this a few years ago but never took it any further. It was always going to need the backing of a financial group to get it off the ground.

Regulated sports betting fund unveiled

Investors seeking uncorrelated, “economy-proof” returns are being offered a new asset class – trading on sports betting exchanges.

The Galileo Fund, which will be launched this week by London-based Centaur Corporate, claims to be the world’s first regulated such vehicle.

It will trade in sports such as football, racing and tennis on Betfair and other online exchanges that facilitate so-called in-running betting, hosting markets on events already in progress.


Good luck to them, I'd much prefer to invest my money in a fund like that, than one susceptible to major crashes in the economy.

ADDENDUM

But are they the right company to launch such a fund? I believe this is the same firm that dabbles in teaching people to trade. Having done that for a few years with Betfair, that's a precarious position to be in, teaching people to eliminate risk but also to make an earn out of it for the business. My Education programme was criticised by Harry Findlay in a Racing UK interview once (words to the effect of "they'd be much better off being taught by me to be a gambler"), and to an extent I agreed with his but a company can't go out and encourage punters to take risks, then sit back and take the profits as said punters go broke. There's an ethical balance between whetting someone's appetite to go their own way and learn more, and just forcing it down their throat and having to deal with complaints when they inevitably got it wrong due to going back to their old, unprofitable habits.

Centaur have also been known for glossy sales pitches and over the years they have also been a tipping and syndication service, and fell foul of the Advertising Standards Authority at one stage...

CentaurGlobal

ASA judgment

Again, good luck to them, but they need to be more transparent if they are to succeed in the financial world. Still a small investment with one's eyes wide open to the risks wouldn't be such a bad thing, but he who takes out a second mortgage for it is asking for trouble...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Wimbledon preview - women

Unfortunately this year I don't have the time to write comprehensive Slam previews anymore so I'll sum this one up pretty quickly - it's all about Serena. 1 - Serena Williams. In incredible form. Since bombing out in R1 of the French Open last year, she has lost just three times - to Kerber (Cincinnati QF), to Stephens (Aus Open QF) and to Azarenka (Doha final). She has won three of the last four Wimbledon finals plus the Olympic gold last year where she dropped just 17 games in six rounds, against opponents which included four former world #1s. All that considered though, I can't have her at 1/2 (1.50) on Betfair. She just has to be opposed. I can't put a finger on who is going to beat her, but I have to side with her prospective opponents. If you want a smokey to put some small change on, try Maria Kirilenko. Her record in the Slam isn't so great but it has been improving - a best result of R4 last year beaten by finalist Radwanska 7-5 in the third, and