Skip to main content

has women's tennis had it's first 'Davydenko' moment?

A rather suspicious WTA match in Charleston, USA, tonight, where Victoria Azarenka retired hurt mid-match. Was it fixed? Was it just punters with information? Does the WTA policy on compelling players to play a certain number of lower-level events and penalising them for withdrawing bring this on?

Quotes from Tennisform, a site which runs an excellent injury and information ticker (subscription required).


17:58 Azarenka
has drifted pre-match to 1.31 from 1.07 [125k traded]. EDIT: Azarenka went off at 1.43, with 168k traded, and continued to drift out to 1.65 before a ball was struck.

19:47 McHale advanced when Azarenka decided to quit with a thigh injury early in the second set. The Belarus drifted alarmingly prior to the match, and continued to drift throughout the match, and despite building a 6/2 *2/1 lead, she was still considered the underdog on Betfair, where the betting patterns were not unlike the infamous Davydenko/Vassallo match in Sopot. (Radio commentaries) "Azarenka wasn't making any mistakes in the first set but she played the match with her thigh strapped and called for the trainer at *2-1 in the second set. She began walking gingerly in the second set and decided to let everyone in the stadium know she was hurt." The match will be investigated and quite a few bookmakers have said they will withhold payment until it is cleared up. It's not the first time that Azarenka has been involved in a suspicious looking match. One or two bookmakers had cause for concern after her matches against Oprandi in Amelia Island in 2007, and Govortsova in Hobart, 2008. McHale 2/6 2/2 ret.


The pre-match betting tells the story. People knew ahead of the match, perhaps just from a public practice session. This was the same injury she retired last week with in Marbella - pretty silly to think she'd be over it so soon, especially with a trans-Atlantic flight involved. But the very suspicious part is that the market had her as the outsider even after she'd won the first set (assuming the comment was for all of the four games in the second set, and not just when she was being treated).

Let's see how this story grows in the next few days....

Comments

  1. Azarenka on Twitter: http://twitter.com/vika7

    who think i tanked the match or whatever they certainly dont have a fucking clue what they talking about...and rules of wta tour
    2 minutes ago via web
    Reply Retweet
    now from the internet i read some nasty things about me and my match today! specially from my own country! its a shame..so for people
    4 minutes ago via web
    i will be ready very soon!
    5 minutes ago via web
    tried to do everything possible,but unfortunately i couldnt do anything..im going back to europe now to continue treatment and hopefully
    6 minutes ago via web
    hello everyone!i had to retire from my match today,because of my injury i got in marbella! too bad i didnt have enough time to get it better
    7 minutes ago via web

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think she is rather naive about these things, but the WTA does have to take a bit of responsibility in this. She has entered Marbella and Charleston to fulfil her requirements as a Top 10 player to play so many non-Premier events. If she pulls out, she gets fined.

    My solution - any player retiring in a match cannot play the following week. Hamstring injuries don't go away in a few days, and especially with a flight involved. It won't solve everything but it will ease the pressure on the player to play when they aren't ready.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…