Skip to main content

the Storm cop it hard - bravo NRL

Well done to the NRL here for having something most sporting bodies are too afraid/too feeble to have - BALLS. Too many sporting authorities allow cheats, or clubs which are financially mismanaged to the level of incompetence or blatant cheating, to continue with barely a slap on the wrist - hardly a deterrent for any other. FIFA and the Premier League - take note.

The Melbourne Storm, the most successful NRL team of recent years have been stripped of two premierships, several minor premierships, all points for season 2010 (gained and yet to be played for) and fined heavily for systematic breaches of the NRL salary cap over several seasons. The club was caught running a second set of books - one with the 'official' contracts listed, and one with the real values. It's not the first time it has happened in the NRL, although this is the biggest breach.



Melbourne Storm stripped of two premierships for salary cap breach


Melbourne Storm have been stripped of two NRL premierships and fined a total of $1.6 million after being found guilty of long-term salary cap breaches.


Storm go from heroes to zeroes
* Ron Reed

ANALYSIS: AUSTRALIAN sport has never witnessed such a savage response to an episode of cheating - and with any luck may never have to again.



For those unfamiliar with league in Australia, Melbourne were a club established in the 90s as the league tried to expand into non-league states. The pressure was on for them to be a success immediately. Players often didn't settle in Melbourne, despite it being the sporting capital of the world, because at best, and until today, rugby league would rarely get any coverage in the first 8 pages at the back of the local papers - it is AFL and AFL only in Victoria. Salary caps make it hard for any club, especially in the NRL as players are susceptible to bigger offers in the UK or from rugby union. But rules are rules, and there is no room for a rogue club in a league.

Rugby league has always had a rebellious culture, which is still seen with players thinking they are above the law and can be bulletproof in the public, like it was the 70s. Those days are long gone in modern society, yet still players are caught for anything from drink driving to assault in public venues to sexual assaults and drug trafficking. Common problems of that age group of society perhaps, but professional athletes have a responsibility when they have kids going to school wearing their jersey and their number/name on the back. Part of being paid a packet is for the sacrifice they have to make - cutting out the dickhead actions so people look up to them. If you want to be anonymous and get pissed in the pub on a Friday night like the regular workforce, then take up a desk job.

It's not just the players who think they can cheat the system though, obviously many of the administrators, many of whom are former players, still have their heads in the clouds as well. Player education and welfare has improved markedly in the past couple of years, usually as a result of watershed moments where someone declares 'enough is enough'. Maybe this is finally the time in the NRL when the penny drops for administrators.....

One question has to be asked - the man in the middle of this has to be former CEO Brian Waldron, who jumped ship to take over the Melbourne Rebels (rather fitting name), the newest club in the Super 15 rugby union competition, starting next year. What action will be taken against him?


Here's a detailed history of salary cap breaches in the NRL and quotes from today's events. (LINK FIXED)

Comments

  1. G'day Scott,

    Agree it's great the NRL caught and punished the Storm, although not being able to earn points this season doesn't make sense. Force them to sack enough players to be under the cap and let them compete from there.

    Overall though, why did it take 5 years to uncover and what other clubs do the same or similar - the $4.1 million cap is too low and needs to change, become more transparent, or at least something.

    Great blog, keep up the excellent work

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…