Skip to main content

Betfair proposal attacked - Victorian racing industry virtually admits money laundering is good for racing

After recent revelations about leaks in sports betting and unknown punters being able to strike questionable bets (Melbourne Storm NRL scandal), Betfair Australia CEO Andrew Twaits put forward the idea of making all punters bet via accounts, or at least be registered so the money trail is traceable. Naturally, this would turn a few off, but the Victorian racing industry has had more than a handful of problems with dirty money being washed at the track by unsavoury gentlemen in tracksuits. When the Federal Government brought in legislation compelling the reporting of all wagers or payouts above $10k, what did they do? Simple, just have several tickets to win $5k each, bypassing the legislation. Or they would watch for a winning punter at the track and offer them a 15% premium to buy their winning ticket so they could collect 'clean' money from the bookmaker.

Back in the early 90s, a member of the Gleeson family was caught as part of a race-fixing allegation at Harold Park harness racing track in Sydney where the hopples of a horse were deliberately cut pre-race, so that they would break very easily during the race. The horse, the hot favourite, galloped and finished out of the placings. The punter backed the exotics without the favourite (from their stable), and stood to collect more than $10k from their shady work. He had bet cash at a TAB agency, but was caught out by the paperwork required with the Federal Govt anti-money laundering bill. Had the bright spark considered giving the ticket to someone not obviously connected with the family, they'd probably have gotten away with it.

Betfair proposal attacked

The proposal from Twaits was never going to find favour from anyone but the sports authorities. In reality, it's not that different from lotteries these days. By setting up a membership system where the cash player swipes their card with each entry, their ticket can then never be lost, so the punter will never miss a payout. Bookies/firms can offer loyalty schemes for punters and the list of options goes on. It's also a useful problem gambling deterrent. But, it would scare off a lot of money from suspicious characters the racing industry is obviously happy to do business with. The Victorian racing industry also relies heavily on poker machine (slot) revenue, another vehicle for laundering vast quantities of money. If you want a cleaner image guys, there's a couple of places to start working on...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Wimbledon preview - women

Unfortunately this year I don't have the time to write comprehensive Slam previews anymore so I'll sum this one up pretty quickly - it's all about Serena. 1 - Serena Williams. In incredible form. Since bombing out in R1 of the French Open last year, she has lost just three times - to Kerber (Cincinnati QF), to Stephens (Aus Open QF) and to Azarenka (Doha final). She has won three of the last four Wimbledon finals plus the Olympic gold last year where she dropped just 17 games in six rounds, against opponents which included four former world #1s. All that considered though, I can't have her at 1/2 (1.50) on Betfair. She just has to be opposed. I can't put a finger on who is going to beat her, but I have to side with her prospective opponents. If you want a smokey to put some small change on, try Maria Kirilenko. Her record in the Slam isn't so great but it has been improving - a best result of R4 last year beaten by finalist Radwanska 7-5 in the third, and