Skip to main content

exchange betting heading to New Jersey racing?

Racing in many states of the US is really struggling. The Off-Track Betting (OTB) of New York is millions in debt (how you can run a monopoly tote at a loss is beyond belief), broadcast rights are a mess, politicians in Arizona thought it was a great idea to ban online betting altogether, Californian racetracks are being sold off to property developers or lobbying to increase takeout rates and trainers who are banned for doping offences in one state can simply up sticks and move to another. With the exception of a handful of tracks, it's a basket case.

New Jersey moves forward with betting exchange plans


This week New Jersey state assembly unanimously voted (78-0) in favour of a bill that would authorise a Betfair-style betting exchange for state residents on horse racing. Like everything in the US, it's restricted by state, but..

"The bill also provides that exchange bets submitted on a given market on the exchange in New Jersey may, under approved conditions, be matched with exchange bets on the same horse race or set of horse races submitted by residents of jurisdictions outside of the state to an authorised exchange operator in that jurisdiction."

meaning if they wanted to, they could partner up with Betfair and A - get them to run it, because they know how to do it, and B - it could link up with Betfair's US racing markets available to the rest of the world, so there is genuine liquidity in the markets.

Also, from NJ approves exchange-style wagering

"Language in the bill calls for money generated from exchange wagering to be committed to state tracks and horsemen but it is not specific. The bill does call for a review of the initial agreement in 2014 at which time the state’s horsemen will have the option to modify it."

The involvement of the state's horsemen is worrying because in virtually every other state they have been dead against any reduction in tote takeouts which according to just about every business study ever commissioned, will lead to higher turnover and thus greater profits. Horsemen are not businesspeople, they are predominantly stubborn folk stuck in the past.

This is a promising development for wagering in the US, but once the proposal starts gathering momentum, wait for the lobbying from the anti-factions over the old chestnut of laying a horse to lose, all stakeholders wanting too much out of the deal thus making the whole point of exchange betting (low margins) a waste of time, and then probably some more stupid politics from another state.

Too many fingers in the pie will bring it down. Exchange betting with 15% commission won't work.




NB To my American readers, please feel free to pick me up on any factual errors or misconceptions in the opening paragraph.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…