Skip to main content

Betfair float to be pushed back again?

The rumours were all saying the company was primed for an October float but lacklustre results from recent flotations may push it back to 2011 or beyond.

A study reported by The Financial Times has shown that more than half of the big "initial public offerings" in Europe this year had shares trading below their issue price, leaving investors sitting on a loss.

Betfair to play waiting game over flotation (subscription)) (free link)

THE prospects of being able to buy shares in Betfair from as soon as next month appear to have taken a knock from the performance of other Stock Market listings in 2010.

In the absence of a commitment from Betfair on its long-mooted Stock Market flotation at a value of as much as £1.5 billion, evidence from other firms appears to show the timing may be wrong.

.
.
.
Preparing for such a massive sea change in the company's ownership is not without its difficulties, but thoughts that October was the favoured month for a Betfair float may need to be reassessed in the light of the post-float experience of other businesses.
.
.
.
Ocado, the online service that delivers Waitrose goods, was forced to cut its flotation price from 200p to 180p and, despite that manoeuvre, shares fell by 20 per cent in just over a month.

Of 31 businesses which floated across Europe since January and which raised more than $100m, 16 were trading under issue price last Friday. The FT also reported that the average performance of six launches backed by Goldman Sachs reported to be an adviser to Betfair - was a drop (from the issue price) of 0.7 per cent.


So it could be a while yet for all those early staff members who are still sitting on their company shares....

Comments

  1. Hi Scott. Just read your page on Spot Fixing which you wrote in April, and you have to consider whether the NOTW blagged your blog! OK, so Spot Fixing is fairly well known about in gambling circles - but I doubt your average man in the street knows anything.
    In my opinion, whoever is involved will be staking huge amounts on events unlikely to affect the result. A bit like the bookie to had a market on how many times Rooney gobbed during a particular match.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ever tried to get set with a bookie on novelty markets? They serve as fodder for PR and mug punters, little else. Spot betting is usually over a period of the match, as little as one over for T20, maybe five overs during a Test. There has to be time for punters to get on, the alarm bells would ring if you rang up the day before to bet on how many wides there would be in the 17th over of a Test match...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

The Cup review

James McDonald feels the emotion of winning the Melbourne Cup on Verry Elleegant. (photo credit Darrian Traynor/Getty Images) With every man and his dog doing Cup previews these days, perhaps a postmortem of the race provides more value - at least for these more serious about the game or want something to refer back to in 363 days' time. It was great to see Flemington basking in the warm spring sun, with no threat of rain which buggers up the confidence you have in the state of the track, an integral part of betting on horses. The crowd was back, at least about 10% of the normal Cup day crowd, but 10,000 more than were allowed last year. Let us never have to deal with these restrictions again in our lifetimes. The TV coverage - well, um, ugh. On Derby Day, I was able to watch the racing.com stream in the UK while Sky Sports Racing kept to their normal NSW-controlled Sky Racing Aus coverage which denies that Victoria and South Australia exist. For Cup Day, they switched to the Chann