Skip to main content

A day of miracles for football layers

Don't expect to see this too often.

Man United, without Wayne Rooney after a controversial week in the press and faced with piles of abuse from the fans of his former club Everton, lead 3-1 with plenty of time on the clock. 73mins gone and they hit 1.01 on Betfair, nothing unusual about that. £217k was matched at the bottom price, and £17 at 1000 on the draw. Cue the comeback in extra time, Everton score twice within a minute and the money-buyers (punters backing 1.01 in big amounts because it's 'better than bank interest') get burnt big time!

In La Liga, Barcelona are at home to promoted side Hercules. They start incredibly short odds, as was warranted by the gulf in class between the teams....apparently! The minnows were matched between 500 and 700 to win 2-0.

And in the late Championship game, Preston North End, managed by Sir Alex Ferguson's son Darren, lead 3-1 with 6 mins to play, get matched at 1.05 and below for nearly £40k (backers wary after the lunchtime game!). PNE player Billy Jones being sent off for time wasting didn't help, and then the avalanche came.... Burnley, matched for pennies at 500, score three quick goals and win 4-3!

What a day for layers of the short prices in football (not me by the way).

None of this can happen without live betting. It sure spices things up doesn't it?


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Comments

  1. Seen the £17 matched on draw in the Everton V Man Utd game, I noticed a good few quid matched at 700 as well. As a backer of goals, I won on this game.

    And then as a backer of goals I did all my winnings and more on the Barcelona game, had a chance to trade out and left my risk because Barcelona couldn't not score at home, could they!

    The biggest risk to the Hercules 2-0 backers was a 3rd Hercules goal, it should have been 3-0.

    At the end of last season the 'free money' 1.01 layers also got their fingers burnt on the Wigan V Arsenal match when Wigan came back to win 3-2.

    It just goes to show what a risky business it is.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…