Skip to main content

and you thought 6 seconds delay on AtTheRaces was bad....

An appalling situation in Australia showing a clear abuse of power by a major TV network. The Bathurst 1000 is a hugely popular motor racing event which has been broadcast live around the nation since it began in the 1960s. As a kid I used to park myself in front of the TV at 7.30am when the coverage started and not move until 5pm after the chequered flag had been waved. Only several beers on Saturday night stopped me from watching the live coverage in the UK in the early hours of Sunday morning.

The host broadcaster decided that making money from advertisers was more important than showing the race live, so what began as a live event, ended up nearly 30 minutes behind by the end of the race.

Channel Seven broadcasts finish of Bathurst 1000 30 minutes after race actually ended

THE Bathurst 1000 became the race that delayed a nation after Channel 7 put the advertising dollar before its audience.

Channel 7's "live" coverage of the Bathurst 1000 was so significantly delayed that despite the race finishing at 4.53pm, they were still "racing" on television until 5.20pm.

Angry motor racing fans bombarded social media sites to blast Seven's coverage.

The network's coverage of Bathurst started out live, but the broadcaster paused and restarted the action to suit its ad breaks.

Normally advertising is slotted in during lulls of the action to prevent delays, but this year Seven struggled to find space.

While Seven blamed the lack of safety cars, fans on Twitter pointed the finger back at the network for over-committing itself with advertisers.



A motor race lasting over six hours, and yet they couldn't find room to put the ads in?? Morons.



"The closeness of the race, the reduced number of safety cars in today's race, advertising commitments and our desire that viewers not miss a single moment of the race led us to time-shift our coverage," the spokesman told The Daily Telegraph.



Pretty naive to schedule ad breaks during safety cars when you have incidents like this spectacular crash which lead to replay after replay, followed by deep analysis about how it happened and how the driver managed to survive!

Currently, Australian residents are banned from betting online during sporting events, something which is standard fare around the rest of the world, and now accounts for more than 50% of sports bets with most online bookmakers. Imagine the outrage in the UK if a network tried to get away with this. It's bad enough in Australia when different states have different broadcast schedules (but still say 'live') or when Friday night football is broadcast an hour late just so the network can squeeze in plenty of ads, but when they start events as live and then dupe viewers into thinking it will remain that way while they squeeze as much as they can from their sponsors, that's outrageous.

I'm led to believe few sporting events broadcast on free-to-air networks in Australia are exempt from this, but Channel 7 is the prime offender. Corporate greed with no respect for their end customers, that's all it comes down to.

If you are ever going to bet on live sport, look for as many sources of 'live' information as you can - TV, radio (always the fastest broadcast medium), internet streams, Twitter and anything else you have access to for comparison. And don't forget watching the odds change - if they don't match your opinion of the event, then be suspicious. Remember it's your money, other people will be more than willing to take it off you and you never have to bet.

Comments

  1. Excellent points mate, its got to the stage where the Australian Government's Anti Siphoning laws have to be abolished as the free to air channels just don't do the sports in question justice. Hasn't even got better with the advent of digital channels.

    In addition to what you mentioned with what Channel 7 do to Bathurst and the AFL there are plenty of other culprits

    Channel 10 left the playoff in the US Masters last year to cross to the Bert Newton morning show and Channel 9 still leave the cricket and cross to their news with 2 overs left in a day despite letting their numerous reality shows to run 15-10 mins over time every week

    ReplyDelete
  2. the poor priorities I can begrudgingly handle, at least for the news, probably because that has been happening for years. It's still crap, but at least they aren't duping people into believing it's still live. This is where interactive services (behind the red button) should be used if that network doesn't have another option. I can't see the government getting involved to ensure the whole event is broadcast and on time....

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…