Skip to main content

Perth racing faces a critical decision

When a state capital of over 1m people has two racecourses close to the city, the inevitable pressure to sell one of them will occur as the popularity of horse racing continues to diminish relative to alternative entertainment options. Racing in Western Australia has been strong in recent years, with metropolitan prizemoney embarrassing South Australia and making it a viable option for owners and trainers. But that has come at a cost - Perth Racing has robbed Peter to pay Paul and now they are struggling to cope with interest payments of $1m per year.

Premier puts Perth Racing under the pump

WA Premier Colin Barnett is mounting pressure on cash-strapped Perth Racing to sell Belmont Park racecourse to make way for the development of a 100,000 seat football stadium.

With Perth Racing to announce major prizemoney cuts this week, the WA industry is supporting Barnett's call to dump the ageing Belmont as a winter racing venue.



Traditionally Ascot is the A-grade track in Perth, while Belmont is the venue during winter, which allows Ascot to recover for its feature events late in the year. In recent years, Adelaide have moved from three racecourses to one (sold off Cheltenham, gave Victoria Park back to the parklands, built an extra track at Morphettville and invested in a bigger provincial circuit at Murray Bridge) and Brisbane has merged its two metropolitan raceclubs in the hope of eventually selling one of the racecourses off and creating a supervenue with the cash.

The state government wants to build a huge stadium for AFL close to the city - whether they need to build it for attendances of 100k though is debatable in a state of this size. If the government gets its way, what will happen to the WACA (a great AFL stadium surely becomes a great cricket stadium) and Gloucester Park harness track? Prime land on the edge of the CBD, not much more they can do to develop it....

WA racing could handle one city track - they have strong provincial clubs including Bunbury and Pinjarra, wet tracks in the west are far less frequent than in the east so wear and tear on the racing surface isn't a big deal. Turning Ascot into a super-venue with better facilities, perhaps an extra turf track to race on and racing for better prizemoney is likely to be a winner.

Comments

  1. I know financially it probably makes sense short term but IMO racing loses out in the long run.

    SA racing is terrible now that they have moved to one track. There is a real sameness to their meetings plus you have the added issue that the track is never allowed to rest.

    Whilst I don't bet in SA any more I still watch them now and then and what is noticeable is the real track bias that takes hold.

    I would hate to see one of Eagle Farm or Doomben go. Brisbane has the most competitive racing in Australia. Would be terrible if they messed with it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The sameness certainly is an issue - I wouldn't wish the American system of racing 5/6 days a week at the same track for 4-6 months of the year on anyone. How on earth can it have any atmosphere if it's just the same thing repeated ad infinitum? I thought Morphettville had two circuits - the regular and the inner Parks track? At least that's something. Looks what's happened to harness racing with the new tracks at Melton & Menangle - way out in the sticks, built for the participants rather than the punters, as they all stay at home. A track without a proper grandstand - very bizarre.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Morphetville does have the two tracks but to tell you the truth they look exactly the same to me. Besides, the outer gets the great majority of racing on the Saturdays.

    I remember as a kid one of the great joys was going to the different tracks. They all had their own idiosyncracies (some bad, some good) and that was one of the attractions.

    Imagine being a punter in SA and going to Morphetville every single week. Would be like Groundhog Day.

    I find it sad whats happened with harness racing.

    Maybe I'm just being an old fogey though. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I believe Murray Bridge and Gawler are getting big investment poured in to give them pseudo-city status, and I notice Oakbank had the first non-Easter meeting I'd ever heard of a few wks back. Back in our day, we'd get to the track for the atmosphere. These days you could drive a bus through the betting ring on most days and not hit anyone.... SA racing has really gone down the tube.

    Variety of tracks is good! Again, couldn't handle the humdrum repetition of US racing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…