Skip to main content

punters shafted again by lame rules and poor stewarding

The UK racing industry insists on running these low standard all-weather meetings to generate turnover to pay the Levy. The Levy fund isn't enough to provide decent prizemoney for these rubbish events. Ireland, slated recently for not having their all-weather track open during the depths of winter, at least maintain a standard - they have minimum prizemoney levels they refuse to break, meaning they won't just run rubbish races for the sake of it with prizemoney of a case of Guinness.

At Lingfield on Thursday, two low-grade handicaps - Class 6 - the lowest of the low in Britain, and described as "..shit, low-grade handicaps" by the trainer in question, were won by horses which were entitled by 20/1 shots at least, with zero recent form on the board. Both horses were backed into favouritism (which to be honest, wouldn't require millions on such poor races) and won comfortably. The humble punter who wasn't in on the information is entitled to throw his hands in the air and give up when formlines like that can be overcome.

The trainer here, Noel Quinlan, has done nothing wrong - he has simply exploited weak points in the current system, like numerous other trainers have done in the past. But he shouldn't be allowed to do so. Punters fund the industry. It is their losses which go to the bookmakers. It is the bookies' profits which pays the levy which funds racing prizemoney. Keep treating punters like idiots and they will find something else to bet on - football, darts, X-Factor, politics... it's a very long list these days.

Punters deserve to be informed. If trainers are running their horses for prizemoney paid for by PUNTERS MONEY, then they should be forced to declare ALL vet treatment. Australian racing has just brought in a nationwide requirement to report any treatment on a horse appearing for a race:

Trainers will soon have to report all relevant procedures administered to a horse. At present, wind operations, bone-chip removals, etc, do not have to be reported, although there is a rule where a trainer has to report to stipes anything that may affect a horse's performance in the week before a race. ''The rule currently is in relation to what's happened in the lead-up to a race,'' Murrihy said. ''Stewards believe it should be mandatory to report things like wind operations and this will be made public.''


Bookmakers concerned Lingfield betting coup will alienate punters

The stewards at Lingfield on Thursday asked no direct questions of the trainers who landed a betting coup in each of the last two races, it emerged yesterday. Noel Quinlan said he spoke only to the stipendiary steward after the easy victories of Bishopbriggs and Tell Halaf, from the Newmarket stable which he shares with his brother, Michael.

Both horses had started at double-figure odds and been well beaten in their six most recent outings but were sent off as favourites at Lingfield after strong late support. Representatives of the major bookmaking firms said that such events could alienate punters from the sport.

"I didn't go into the stewards' at all," Quinlan said, "The stipe took notes off me, took them to the stewards and they've accepted my explanations. I couldn't see why they wouldn't. We're talking about shit, low-grade handicaps."


Bookies aren't particularly whinging about this case, other plunges have cost them far more financially, it's just the industry will slowly die unless something is done about it.

Keep screwing punters sideways and they'll find something else to do. The addicts will switch to the soulless FOBTs and virtual racing, the more sensible might just keep their money in their pockets.....

Comments

  1. 100% agree Scott.

    While no-one has done anything wrong here, it can only alienate the mug punter (like me) who isn't privvy to such information.

    To be honest it already has, I tend to waste much less of my hard earned on the Horses than I used to :)

    Still waste the money mind............

    You sold them shares yet? Still reckon £6 more likely than anything over £10. Even if the US opens up won't be plain sailing for the Betfair Boys imo.

    They asked you back yet? Reckon you could do a much better job than the jokers in there at the moment.

    Good Luck

    SP

    ReplyDelete
  2. Share price doesn't affect me, never got involved due to a previous bad experience with a gambling company float (IAS). As for going back, they'd need a change of leadership and a return to the days of valuing the customer before I'd consider it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…