Skip to main content

Annoying and misleading Betfair TV ad banned

You seriously have to wonder where the brains department of Betfair have disappeared to. A TV campaign based around the theme 'cut out the middleman'. Look it up in the dictionary - Betfair are the irrefutable definition of the word:

mid·dle·man   

[mid-l-man]
–noun, plural -men.
1.
a person who plays an economic role intermediate between producer and retailer or consumer.
2.
a person who acts as an intermediary.

So what else do Betfair do then??



The Advertising Standards Authority yesterday banned the ad after a series of complaints, stating that the advert was misleading and conveniently forgot to mention they take out a commission.
Labels:

Comments

  1. cassie marrone9 February 2011 at 22:32

    Despite what the Advertising Standard Authority says, I think it's a great ad. It showcases Betfair's strength with consumers - letting you bet directly against another punter, at odd you think are fair.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Christian5 March 2011 at 23:56

    As someone who has no stake in the company but knows it a fair deal, I can say that Betfair is a great company, full of innovative ideas and with great people, including the marketing department.

    To their main credit, they provide a very lively betting market place as alternative to the high street betting shops which create their own odds. Thus, they bring punters directly together and this market place is what creates the odds.

    Of course, Betfair somehow has to make money from this. A commission based business model is fairly standard - just look at eBay, Google, etc.

    Thus, the criticism against these ads is hardly justifiable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Scott6 March 2011 at 16:48

    by the same logic, every murderer would get let off in court because Grandma said 'he was a nice boy'. Character references mean jack shit. Betfair can claim to be everything else under the sun, and they have revolutionised the betting industry for the better.

    But the fact of the matter is they claim not to be the middle man, when they most blatantly are. It is that simple.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur
14 comments
Read more

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...
33 comments
Read more

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla
12 comments
Read more