Skip to main content

folks are dumb where I come from

Every country breeds people who aren't the most educationally gifted. We need these people in society to do various jobs that others aren't keen on, whether that's a trade or collecting our bins or picking up glasses in nightclubs. But in Australia, we like to vote them into government.

NSW backs crackdown on negative betting

THE minister responsible for gambling in NSW, George Souris, has thrown his support behind a crackdown on ''negative exotic betting'' over the internet, which the state government believes is threatening the integrity of professional sport.

Responding to comments by the new Minister for Sport, Graham Annesley, in his inaugural speech in the NSW Parliament on Tuesday, Mr Souris said he was determined to pursue a solution at a meeting of state and federal ministers later this month.

Mr Souris said the government wanted to ''promote, with the Commonwealth, a need for a national agreement with all the states so … compliance can be achieved across the board''

The federal Sports Minister, Mark Arbib, and state and territory sports ministers agreed in February, before the change of government in NSW, to develop a national framework to detect and deter match-fixing incidents.

The independent senator Nick Xenophon is drafting a bill that would ban ''exotic'' sports betting.

At the same time, the NSW Law Reform Commission is receiving submissions on its review of ''Cheating at Gambling''.

However, Mr Souris stressed that the state government wanted to specifically target ''negative'' exotic betting.

''The bet that I'm talking about is a negative bet [which] says that [a player] will not kick more than three goals today. That means he will possibly deliberately miss the fourth goal. That's the potential risk.''


Read more via the link.

Seriously, how bloody thick do you have to be to not understand the concept that every bet to win also is a bet (for every other option) to lose?

If you bet on Frankel to win the 2000 Guineas, you wanted every horse in the race to lose.
If you bet on the Queen to wear a yellow hat to the wedding, you wanted every colour in her wardrobe to not be chosen.
If you bet on Middlefart (yes, that's a real team) to win their Denmark 2nd Division West match against Skovbakken tomorrow, you are betting on Skovbakken to lose.

It makes zero difference whether these bets are placed with Betfair, a tote pool or Dodgy Bob in the corner of your local pub. If you are buying something, somebody else has to be selling - it's exactly the same principle.

If you are the Minister for Gambling, you should be able to understand such blatantly simple concepts!

Comments

  1. Nick Xenophon is in politics because he would be unemployable in the private sector.

    He has the smallest pea brain, it's a wonder he can draft bills and breathe at the same time...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Xenophon's cluelessness has been shown up before but the scary part is, he's only a small part of this bill, Souris is the prime instigator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'll take Garbo's over Politicians any day. Far brighter breed. Garbo's don';t do their job for week everyone would notice, doubt that would be the same for Politicians!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…