Skip to main content

folks are dumb where I come from

Every country breeds people who aren't the most educationally gifted. We need these people in society to do various jobs that others aren't keen on, whether that's a trade or collecting our bins or picking up glasses in nightclubs. But in Australia, we like to vote them into government.

NSW backs crackdown on negative betting

THE minister responsible for gambling in NSW, George Souris, has thrown his support behind a crackdown on ''negative exotic betting'' over the internet, which the state government believes is threatening the integrity of professional sport.

Responding to comments by the new Minister for Sport, Graham Annesley, in his inaugural speech in the NSW Parliament on Tuesday, Mr Souris said he was determined to pursue a solution at a meeting of state and federal ministers later this month.

Mr Souris said the government wanted to ''promote, with the Commonwealth, a need for a national agreement with all the states so … compliance can be achieved across the board''

The federal Sports Minister, Mark Arbib, and state and territory sports ministers agreed in February, before the change of government in NSW, to develop a national framework to detect and deter match-fixing incidents.

The independent senator Nick Xenophon is drafting a bill that would ban ''exotic'' sports betting.

At the same time, the NSW Law Reform Commission is receiving submissions on its review of ''Cheating at Gambling''.

However, Mr Souris stressed that the state government wanted to specifically target ''negative'' exotic betting.

''The bet that I'm talking about is a negative bet [which] says that [a player] will not kick more than three goals today. That means he will possibly deliberately miss the fourth goal. That's the potential risk.''


Read more via the link.

Seriously, how bloody thick do you have to be to not understand the concept that every bet to win also is a bet (for every other option) to lose?

If you bet on Frankel to win the 2000 Guineas, you wanted every horse in the race to lose.
If you bet on the Queen to wear a yellow hat to the wedding, you wanted every colour in her wardrobe to not be chosen.
If you bet on Middlefart (yes, that's a real team) to win their Denmark 2nd Division West match against Skovbakken tomorrow, you are betting on Skovbakken to lose.

It makes zero difference whether these bets are placed with Betfair, a tote pool or Dodgy Bob in the corner of your local pub. If you are buying something, somebody else has to be selling - it's exactly the same principle.

If you are the Minister for Gambling, you should be able to understand such blatantly simple concepts!

Comments

  1. Nick Xenophon is in politics because he would be unemployable in the private sector.

    He has the smallest pea brain, it's a wonder he can draft bills and breathe at the same time...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Xenophon's cluelessness has been shown up before but the scary part is, he's only a small part of this bill, Souris is the prime instigator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'll take Garbo's over Politicians any day. Far brighter breed. Garbo's don';t do their job for week everyone would notice, doubt that would be the same for Politicians!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T