Skip to main content

How many fuckups is Paul Roy entitled to?

I'm sick of this bullshit of the 'age of forgiveness'. Not that long ago, people had honour - when they laid their cards on the table and screwed up royally, they packed their bags and left. These days it's like the Aussie cricket team - harder to leave than it is to get in, no matter how shit you are at what you do. Ricky Ponting was allowed to lose the Ashes three times before being forced to walk the plank as captain. If you can bullshit with the best of them, you've got a job for life apparently.

BHA Chief Exec Paul Roy has made at least three absolute blunders whilst at the helm which should have sent him to the dole queue a long time ago. But it seems he is impossible to sack and won't walk because he has less class than a Premier League footballer with a superinjunction.

Blunder 1 - in his other role as big cheese of an investment firm, he recommended buying a big chunk of shares in Betfair.

The fact he didn't notice they were massively overvalued is bad enough but the conflict of interest with his role at the BHA was extraordinary considering he is always at loggerheads with the exchange and bookmakers. A politician wouldn't be allowed to get away with that, why did Roy escape the noose?

Blunder 2 - being part of the BHA team who publicly declared that the Sir Martin Broughton-led syndicate, SIP, was the best fit for racing and the only possible winner in the Tote bidding process.

No independence, no keeping at arm's length until the Govt had made their decision, just blurting out their allegiance with blatant disregard for process or fairness. Betfair had the sense to stop Andrew 'Bert' Black from answering media questions when he answered 'Ooh, that looks a bit dodgy doesn't it?' to allegations a race was fixed back in the early days - you'd think an organisation like the BHA would have some idea how to manage media and industry relations by now. And for someone so well connected in the financial world, you'd have thought he'd check the sums all added up. Sports Investment Partners was a bid from an ex-BHB chairman with senior executives coming from bookmaking backgrounds - apparently the very thing they wanted to avoid with Fred Done.

Blunder 3 - the daddy of them all. Once again, this muppet has wasted racing industry money on investigating whether winning Betfair users should be taxed/forced to pay levy.

Amazingly, the legal verdict from EVERY OTHER legal advisor bar his own was that they were wasting their time yet again. I can make a profit via William Hill, Ladbrokes, the Tote, BetFred (if they bothered to pay out) or any combination of firms in a variety of bets which form exactly the same function as laying on Betfair. A professional backer pays no levy to the industry, why should anyone else who does not stand on course, set their own payout terms and hold punters' money? This argument from the top of the racing industry has been tried again and again, there was absolutely no reason to think anything would change. No legal precedent elsewhere, no legislative change, no EU directive, nada. So the BHA has pissed another couple of million up the wall which should have gone to prizemoney, facilities, improved stewarding, better data such as sectional timing.... but instead it went to scratch this fool's ego. If it really was a board decision, then the rest of the incompetent fools should go to. WAKE UP, IT IS 2011, NOT 1962!!!

In Thursday's Racing Post, Roy defiantly says he has a job to do and will continue to do so. Meanwhile racing continues to flounder because the industry is being run like an old boys' club rather than an industry worth billions. Great leaders say 'the buck stops here', they hold their hand up and admit they screwed up, they fall on their sword when the blunder has been huge. They inspire the people around them to improve and put the cause far and above their personal vendettas and egos.... racing is in desperate need for a great leader.

Comments

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…