Skip to main content

US Open preview - men

It's Slam time again which means I've been busy with betting previews. I've been writing these for all the Slams since 2000 with some tasty winners along the way...

Men's draw

Changing of the guard with Djokovic holding the no.1 seed mantle for the first time at a Slam. If his shoulder ailment has gone, then the title is his to lose. But if he isn't full strength, it's wide open. Expect severe disruption to the schedule for the first couple of days until the after-effects of Hurricane Irene peter out completely.

1. Djokovic - his form this year makes him the most dominant man I have seen across all surfaces. 57-2 is incredible, particularly with the most recent defeat being a precautionary retirement due to an ailing shoulder (Cincinnati final). Early rounds should be a breeze, gets harder in week two - Gasquet, followed by Berdych or Monfils. 2.3
32. Dodig - first time seed facing former world #3 in R1. Tough initiation. Beat Nadal in Montreal so can pull a shock result out from time to time. 1000
22. Dolgopolov - yet to make an impact at the Slams, has the talent to mix it with the best. Nishikori R2, Gasquet R3 will be intriguing clashes for him - can with both of those, but no chance of getting past Djokovic soon after. 400
13. Gasquet - never past the fourth round here, the talent is there but the application always suffers. Opens up against big-server Stakhovsky, followed by Karlovic or Gonzalez. Has to be on the ball just to meet another seed in R3. 250
9. Berdych - after beating Federer in Cincinnati, he retired in the semi-final with a shoulder injury. Not an ailment you want to suffer just before a Grand Slam on a quick surface. Has bombed in R1 twice in last three years, yet to get past R4. 80
20. Tipsarevic - awful Slam record, just two Wimbledon R4s to show from 30 events. That said, he has changed focus this season with two titles won. 1000
31. Granollers - 16 Slam main draws, never past R2! Ranking obviously based on winning a lot of matches in weak tournaments. 1000
7. Monfils - Rasheed seems to have improved him. Finalist Washington, beaten by Djokovic in the quarters at Montreal and Cincinnati, but his wins over top 10 players are few and far between. Tricky opener against Dimitrov, could face Djokovic again in the QF. 150
3. Federer - still capable of brilliance, but tellingly, now more capable of average days when those he once dominated can beat him. Inflicted the only full match defeat of Djokovic this year at Roland Garros, but then threw away a two-set lead against Tsonga at Wimbledon. Beaten by Tsonga again in Montreal and then by an ailing Berdych in Cincinnati. Tsonga/Fish in the quarters will be a real test for him. I still maintain my view that he will not win another major tournament (and nor will his mate Tiger for that matter). 12


Read the rest at PuntingAce


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T