Skip to main content

US Open preview - women

Women's draw


Are we back to Serena domination of the WTA Tour or she is the best one left in a bad bunch? Clijsters is injured again, Wozniacki is proving a dud at number one and every other player on the women's tour seems to have issues. It seems there has never been a more urgent need for some fresh young faces to step forward and really upset the applecart.
With Hurricane Irene surging up the east coast of the US, it's hard to know at this stage just how disrupted the tournament will be, but it's a long, long odds-on that critics will be calling for a roof to be built over the show courts yet again….

Working down the draw this time.

1 - Wozniacki. In the papers more for her lovelife now than her tennis. Is that first Grand Slam win ever going to emerge? Losing first-up to McHale in Cincinnati isn't the way to suggest it will be this time, although she did reverse that result in New Haven, a tournament she always plays well in. Has form here but backing her to win the final is worse than backing Murray in the men. Shouldn't have too many worries through the first week, Petkovic/Li in the quarters will turn up the heat.

29. Gajdosova - has lost six matches in a row. Serious danger of losing R1 to Benesova. 1000

21. Hantuchova - usually a safe bet through the first week, then it all goes downhill. 1000

15. Kuznetsova - has lost three out of five since Wimbledon, gone off the boil. Leads R1 opponent Errani 3-0. 500

10. Petkovic - flying this year. If you drop the grass events out of her results, she has reached at least the QFs of her last five tournaments. Complained of a minor knee injury in Cincinnati but assured fans she will be fine in time. Has beaten Wozniacki, Jankovic, Sharapova and Kvitova on hardcore this year. 40

18. Vinci - the non-conventional player on the WTA Tour, using a lot of slice, attacking the net and confusing many of the robotic players on the circuit these days. Can't see her making an impact here, but she did beat Ivanovic, Wickmayer and Wozniacki in Toronto. 200

31. Kanepi - has been hampered by an achilles injury for months. Won't last long. 1000

6. Li - had two wins in a row this week in New Haven for the first time since Paris. Match vs Petkovic in R4 could be a cracker. Can beat them all when she clicks. Might be slightly off-form but at least you know she can do it at the business end. 20

4. Azarenka - edging her way closer to the top but needs to start racking up the big titles. Has a habit of getting injured at the wrong times, needs to break that spell to claim a Slam. Worst draw possible - meets Serena in R3. Also has Ivanovic and Jankovic in her half. 16

28. Serena W - clearcut favourite and hard to argue with that. 16-2 for the year, but did pull out of Cincinnati with a toe injury. At the time she claimed to be resting it for New York. Won 2008, missed 2010, so her last match was that controversial semi against Clijsters where she copped a point penalty on match point for threatening to kill a line judge. Has won five of the last nine Slams she has turned up to....



You can read the remainder of the preview here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…