Skip to main content

the battle against match-fixing - can it be won?

Some damning stats in this article from BBC Sport. This is a fight FIFA are no more likely to win than the Occupy groups are to takeover the world's financial districts or someone to achieve world peace....

Report shows match-fixing rife in Southern and Eastern Europe

The true scale of match-fixing, racism and violence in European football has been revealed in new statistical research due to be released on Tuesday.

FIFPro, the worldwide union for professional footballers, conducted a survey of thousands of players in Eastern and Southern Europe.

Almost a quarter of players (23.6%) are aware of match-fixing in their league.

The stats may cause particular concern for 2018 World Cup hosts Russia, where that figure is as high as 43.5%.

The Black Book, a copy of which has been seen by the BBC, shows that 11.9% of footballers have been approached to consider fixing the result of a game, with that figure reaching 30.3% in Greece.

The research found a clear link between non-payment of player salaries and match-fixing.

As many as 41.1% of players have not had their salary paid on time, of which more than half were approached to consider fixing a match.

Are we really surprised by these figures?
Think about it:
- dodgy local justice system
- widespread acceptance of bribes and corruption in society
- clubs often living beyond their means and not paying players on time
- games often aren't widely screened and thus not subject to major scrutiny
- poor economic climate leads to players being tempted by quick gains, no matter how immoral (could be the case almost anywhere at present)
- jealousy of low-paid players earning far less than people betting on the match
- plus all the 'regular' dressing room issues which could play a part

So why would a fixer target games in places like these rather than the high-profile leagues? Ethics of the participants is one key factor but the biggest ones will be cost and risk. Why do huge global companies have their goods made in places like Bangladesh or China? It's cheaper and less hassle. Why pay £5m to bribe a top-tier team when you could do it for 50k in eastern Europe? Via the unregulated betting markets in Asia, you could get on for six figures with relative ease on the lesser match and the likelihood of follow-up investigations is low if you can keep the players/ref quiet. If you deal with someone as stupid as Mervyn Westfield, then you'll be exposed very quickly. If you tried that in the UK, it would set off so many alarms, very quickly the papers, the world of Twitter, the police, Crown Prosecution Service and thousands of cynical fans would be on their case demanding blood. And public disgust at a mere rumour of match-fixing would taint a participant's CV for many years to come. To buy a player's soul to fix a high-profile match would cost a huge sum, then multiply that out for as many players as required. The risk is far too high even if the profit margin could be as lucrative as the lower level game. Plus if you did somehow manage to pull it off, you would find it very tough to be able to do it again and again - unlike the low-grade game, there are thousands of those around the world every month.

Betting is a global business. The weak points of the chain are where naïve governments think banning the pastime is for the greater good of the people. This means everything is swept under the carpet, no proper system of regulation and probity exist, and bookmakers don't pay into the public revenue. It's not prohibition in the 30s (which flopped anyway). The world is a small place these days, money can change 'hands' in an instant and there are plenty of shady folk happy to deal in sport-fixing rather than drug trafficking. After all, as the SSN report a few months back shared - the penalties for fixing matches are unlikely to be more than a couple of years in jail in most countries, while many still execute convicted drug traffickers....

Until tax-dodging chairmen and fly-by-night businessmen are removed from the game worldwide, and players paid serious money to reflect the worth of the game worldwide, there's no chance this will ever be eradicated. Governments dig their heads in the sand about the benefits of regulating gambling. Societies accept endemic corruption. Players get abused by shady agents trafficking them out of slums of Africa and then dumping them in Europe with no cash and broken dreams. Contrast all this against the backdrop of obvious FIFA corruption for huge money, TV contracts worth more than the GDP of a swag of nations and professional players living the celebrity lifestyle with, in many cases, marginal talent!

Football is so big, so global, so integrated in society from top to bottom, across all religions and cultures, that this problem is not going to go away.

Comments

  1. Wonder if there are any stats for the likes of the Argentinian leagues and their SA neighbours ? Cheating bar stewards the lot of 'em.

    Changing the subject slightly would you mind adding my site back to your blogroll. It used to appear there in the past but I got slack and stopped posting for a while so you binned me. I'm back with something that actually might be interesting if I can get the wheels to spin. Thanks in advance,

    Swearbox

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reinstated only if you promise to keep it updated! :)

    Re South American football - there's no historical betting culture down there, but that's not to say there's no history of match-fixing. Often it's more to do with promotion & relegation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…