Skip to main content

Friday swimming previews

Much better results last night, although I can admit I wasn't expecting to see Lochte beaten twice - once would have been enough for a nice profit. And Kromiwidjojo was impressive, she should be about 1.6 now for the 50m final, so there's still value to be had.

P&L now stands at

BETS 16 (one still open)
TURNOVER (settled) 20.5 units
PROFIT +3.57 units

Womens 200 Back

The two Americans Beisel and Franklin should have a mortgage on this one. Beisel was fastest in the semis with a new PB but it's Franklin who holds favouritism - her time to win the Worlds last year is still over a second better. The 17yo with the size 13 feet has had a hectic schedule and won her semi by almost 1.5 seconds - cruise mode. She had Beisel's measure clearly at the US Trials, expect a repeat here. 1.45 not a straight out price for me, read on for a multi bet...

Mens 100 Fly

Michael Phelps has come up mighty short in this race - he might have the clear best time in the semis but considering he was pipped by Le Clos in the 200 and only beat Cavic by .01 in Beijing, it's unders as far as I'm concerned. Attempted three-peats haven't gone so well this week. There is belief now that Phelps can be beaten - that often provides a boost to opponents. There have also been some ridiculous prices matched in-play, don't be afraid to throw in a 1.03 lay as well.

Lay Phelps around 1.22 risking half a unit. The price should fluctuate enough during the day to get matched even if you are a couple of ticks behind the front price.

Womens 800 Free

Becky Adlington in the 800m was always TeamGB's best chance of a gold in the pool and now is her time to claim it. She has had the wood over her main rival, Dane Lotte Friis for years, with the exception being WC2009 when Adlington refused to wear the now banned non-textile suits. Also in the pack is 15yo American Ledecky, who clipped more than five seconds off her best at the US Trials in June. Did the American team accuse her of taking drugs to achieve that time? Nope, didn't think so. It's quite possible she can go faster again. Adlington has had high expectations of her ever since Beijing and has been handling the pressure exceptionally well, she can do this.

1pt multi - Adlington 800Free / Franklin 200Back - 2.0 or better

Mens 50 Free

Fastest in the semis were defending champ Cesar Cielo and American Cullen Jones, giving hope for a close final to this one-lap dash. But Cielo is a master when it comes to pacing himself for finals. In the last three big championships - Beijing 08, Rome WC 09, Shanghai WC11 - he has won by a relative space (0.13 - 0.38s, doesn't seem like much but it's a big margin at this distance), and it should be odds-on it happens again. It leaves a little bit of a sour taste in the mouth considering he has served a drug ban, but if he's in the field, he's in the betting...

2pts Cielo 2.1 Lads, EV Stan James (bet down to 1.8)

Comments

  1. Surprised you went that big on a 50m race given the small margin for error. I would have thought that laying the favourite would be more profitable in the long run than backing it as the race is a complete lottery really. What are your thoughts on this Scott?

    ReplyDelete
  2. fair comment Zepp, but these guys are specialists. Cielo had won the last two WCs plus the Beijing gold and went through the prelims in his usual style. He deserved to be odds-on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. however I'll admit my staking has been fairly sloppy this week :(

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T