Skip to main content

hockey medal markets - men

Down to the final four in both events now, time to analyse the nations still in contention:

MEN

Australia - prohibitive favourites before the tournament but their group form has ranged from scintillating to mediocre. They were bully boys against South Africa in game 1 (6-0), Spain in the second match (5-0) and then Pakistan (7-0) in the final match when they were under a bit of pressure. In between though, they gave up two and three-goal leads respectively against Argentina (ended 2-2), and Great Britain (ended 3-3). They can't afford mistakes like that at the business end of the tournament - they are the team being hunted, and traditional rivals Germany and the Netherlands will not allow them an inch.

Netherlands - haven't lost a group game at the Olympics since 2000, but that hasn't led to a trio of gold medals - just one the one (Sydney) and they didn't even get a medal in Beijing. Slow starters, win only a 3-2 win over India, who are now terrible despite their history in the sport - no points in that group is just embarrassing. Since then the Orangemen have cruised through, including a convincing 3-1 win over Germany, next best in the group. Penalty corners are their forte, they have converted 6/15 so far in the tournament (40%). In comparison, Australia are 7/26 at the same stage.

Germany - reigning gold medallists, but they have the tough draw from here - Australia then the Dutch to retain their supremacy. 14 goals scored in the group games but also conceded 11, including 5-5 against NZ last night, but to be fair, there was nothing at stake in that game, they couldn't move from second, so the incentive to go soft in the tackles was there. They will step up against Australia, it's a long rivalry and it is unlikely to be a walkover for the Kookaburras.

Great Britain - surprised with a 3-3 draw against Australia during the week, a great fightback from 0-3. With the focus on this Olympiad, GB (and England, the more regular way they play) have improved greatly, but they are the outsider of the four in the semis. Can the dream continue? They conceded only one penalty corner against Australia, and they will need to be similarly miserly against the touch who have long been the best PC unit in the sport.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It would be a massive shock if the final was not Australia vs the Netherlands. In the semis, Australia are 1.6 to beat Germany in 70mins, while the Netherlands 1.91 to beat GB in normal time. I'd have marked the Dutch as the stronger favourites.

2pts Netherlands to beat GB in normal time 1.91 - Paddy Power & Corals

Outright - I talked up a lay of Australia earlier in the week before they walloped Pakistan. 1.75 is perhaps a touch of unders but I wouldn't go too heavy on the lay now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…