Skip to main content

hockey medal markets - men

Down to the final four in both events now, time to analyse the nations still in contention:

MEN

Australia - prohibitive favourites before the tournament but their group form has ranged from scintillating to mediocre. They were bully boys against South Africa in game 1 (6-0), Spain in the second match (5-0) and then Pakistan (7-0) in the final match when they were under a bit of pressure. In between though, they gave up two and three-goal leads respectively against Argentina (ended 2-2), and Great Britain (ended 3-3). They can't afford mistakes like that at the business end of the tournament - they are the team being hunted, and traditional rivals Germany and the Netherlands will not allow them an inch.

Netherlands - haven't lost a group game at the Olympics since 2000, but that hasn't led to a trio of gold medals - just one the one (Sydney) and they didn't even get a medal in Beijing. Slow starters, win only a 3-2 win over India, who are now terrible despite their history in the sport - no points in that group is just embarrassing. Since then the Orangemen have cruised through, including a convincing 3-1 win over Germany, next best in the group. Penalty corners are their forte, they have converted 6/15 so far in the tournament (40%). In comparison, Australia are 7/26 at the same stage.

Germany - reigning gold medallists, but they have the tough draw from here - Australia then the Dutch to retain their supremacy. 14 goals scored in the group games but also conceded 11, including 5-5 against NZ last night, but to be fair, there was nothing at stake in that game, they couldn't move from second, so the incentive to go soft in the tackles was there. They will step up against Australia, it's a long rivalry and it is unlikely to be a walkover for the Kookaburras.

Great Britain - surprised with a 3-3 draw against Australia during the week, a great fightback from 0-3. With the focus on this Olympiad, GB (and England, the more regular way they play) have improved greatly, but they are the outsider of the four in the semis. Can the dream continue? They conceded only one penalty corner against Australia, and they will need to be similarly miserly against the touch who have long been the best PC unit in the sport.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It would be a massive shock if the final was not Australia vs the Netherlands. In the semis, Australia are 1.6 to beat Germany in 70mins, while the Netherlands 1.91 to beat GB in normal time. I'd have marked the Dutch as the stronger favourites.

2pts Netherlands to beat GB in normal time 1.91 - Paddy Power & Corals

Outright - I talked up a lay of Australia earlier in the week before they walloped Pakistan. 1.75 is perhaps a touch of unders but I wouldn't go too heavy on the lay now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also,

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...