Skip to main content

hockey medal markets - women

Netherlands - as with their men's team, the Dutch ladies have yet to drop a point. They are defending champions and took the silver in Athens. Apart from a 3-0 victory over Belgium (bottom of the group) on opening day, they have only won their matches by a single goal indicating low margin for error on the day. Their penalty corner conversion rate is rubbish at this level - 1/8 against Belgium, 0/10 against China - so it's their field play which needs to get them over the line. A risk at odds-on for the title I reckon...

Argentina - bronze medallists at the last two Olympics, silver in Sydney, this will be the last chance for the great Luciana Aymar to get her hands on Olympic gold before she retires. Apart from the shock 0-1 result against bottom-placed USA in the group stage, this team have been very solid, with three wins and a draw, conceding no more than one goal per game. In the final match, they needed a draw or better against Australia, and they locked the game down to a drab 0-0 result to proceed to the next round. 12 goals for sounds pretty good, unless you see that they flogged South Africa 7-0 in the first game. Their games won't be adventurous or high scoring, making a single loss always an option.

Great Britain - the better hope of the home sides with a winnable match ahead of them. The GB team will create chances, they can score from the field and from penalty corners, but in the semis they face a team with a rigid defence. Home support will be enormous and may just tip the match in their favour.

New Zealand - no surprise to see this side in the semis, they have been better than the Hockeyroos for a few years now, under the leadership of legendary Aussie striker Mark Hager. The female Black Sticks had their chances against Argentina in their only group defeat but went down 2-1. They beat Australia, drew with Germany (all that was required to get through to the semis) and covered the rest comfortably (while the victory over the US was only 3-2, it was 20 shots against two for the match). Not hopeless, they've earned their spot here and the Dutch girls won't be able to take them lightly.

RECOMMENDATION

I reckon GB could take the gold here, Argentina haven't flattered and the Dutch aren't been teams with ease as yet. 4.5 for the gold is nice enough in a field of four, but I'll go harder on laying Argentina to win in normal time tonight.

1pt GB to win gold 4.5
Lay Argentina at odds-on (around 1.9-1.95 expected) risking 1.5pts

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla