Skip to main content

Rewards4Racing Novices´ Handicap Chase preview

Another excellent piece of penmanship here from Calum Madell, covering the get-out stakes. Small plug to the sponsor, a company set up by former colleague @joshapiafi, that's a huge achievement to sponsor a race at the Festival.

-------------

5:20 – Rewards4Racing Novices´ Handicap Chase (Listed Race) (Class 1) (5yo+ 0-140)

A race that is a strong one for the stats, with every winner finishing first or second last time out and that shows that horses need to get to a certain level as to guarantee a run. It’s also a race where well fancied runners do well while another positive is interestingly horses getting beat on their first two chasing starts of their career.

Likely favourite Colour Squadron is one I want to oppose for this and also for the fact he doesn’t jump very well at all. He looked a natural chaser last year and though he could be thrown in based on some of his top hurdles form, he’s one I’d be avoiding.

Similar can be said for Carlito Brigante who is fancied to take another Festival handicap and he has mixed it with some of the best about over the bigger obstacles. He’s a lot more solid than the Hobbs runner but two horses instantly caught my eye and they were Shangani and THE DRUIDS NEPHEW. The former has impressed on his last two starts, showing he stays very well and will relish the ground and the trip. He also represents a stable that know how to train a progressive handicapper and I think he’ll go very close. Preference though is for the latter who I have been a real fan of for quite a while. Former Cheltenham Hurdles form is another positive for the race which he has and though he started his jumps career in decent style, he has improved significantly for every run. His tight second to Hadrian’s Approach at Ascot is some of the best form on show, if not the best while his win at Wincanton after has been boosted by Grandioso who duly obliged at Kempton after. He stays all day, well relish the ground, jumps well and altogether I think he has a major chance.

Charlie Longsdon has both Vulcanite and Hazy Tom but I fancy neither. I think the former is gutless and this trip and ground is not what he wants and similar can be said for the latter who wants better ground and is not badly treated when getting it. Both have better chances at Aintree.

Johns Spirit has solid form behind Katenko though never got into a similar race here and that is a worry for him and also Radjhani Express who was in the same race where both didn’t make a challenge from the rear.

The consistent Bobowen has seemed to show his hand and Ohio Gold is very similar. They both have good chances of getting into the place money though.

Forgotten Gold has strong form behind Super Duty but he didn’t back it up after that and the run on terrible ground may have had an effect.

Kruzhlinin and Fourjacks are not without chance and seeing as they’ve been running up North they may be overpriced.

Arthurs Pass is interesting at the bottom of the weights while Howards Legacy also has really good form in the book, especially with Opening Batsman, but he may need further. There’s others worthy of mentioning but I won't go on further.

Advice
The Druids Nephew 3pts win with William Hill @7/1

Read more of Calum's work on his excellent blog or follow him on Twitter @calummadell.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T