Skip to main content

Tom Waterhouse has to be stopped...

.. or the whole Australian betting industry will suffer for it.

If you have seen any Australian sports broadcasts lately, no matter where you are in the world, then Tom Waterhouse probably annoys you. Multiply that by 100 if you live in Australia and are subject to all the commercials, advertorials and other forms if intrusive advertising he spends millions on. Just look on Twitter during a live NRL game and witness how much hatred there is the guy.

Below is a sample of an excellent article by a contemporary at On The Punt, @onthepunt, the original Australian sports betting news site, detailing how much damage the Waterhouse omnipresence is doing to the Australian industry.

Waterhouse: Has to be stopped

How is it possible that sports betting has become so on the nose in recent times?

We have a couple of hundred thousand highly addictive, socially destructive monsters known as poker machines scattered on every street corner doing untold damage every day, yet the relatively minor pursuit of sports betting is suddenly on every wowser's agenda.

Politicians are talking about it. Seemingly sensible journalists in the mainstream media are talking about it.



Even the general community seems to be exhibiting a level of ill-feeling that in recent times has only been reserved for the likes of the Federal Labor Party.

As far as I'm concerned, most of the criticism comes down to two words: Tom Waterhouse.

.
.
.
Read the complete article at OnThePunt.

Comments

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…