Skip to main content

Betfair to go private again?

Interesting reports emerged over the weekend about the possibility of a buyer for Betfair. It turns out the firm behind it specialise in management takeovers so that sounds like some of the existing shareholders stepping in to buy the firm back, rather than see it continue to look like a lame duck on the public markets.

CVC in talks over Betfair takeover bid

CVC Capital Partners, the owner of Formula One, has held talks about a takeover bid for Betfair, the online gambling exchange.

The private equity firm said on Monday that it had held preliminary discussions with Richard Koch, Antony Ball and partners about Betfair, which could include an offer for the firm by funds advised by CVC together with the two men and partners.

Betfair shares jumped as much as 14pc in early trading in London.

Mr Koch, an author, investor and co-founder of LEK Consulting, holds a 6.9pc stake in Betfair. Mr Ball is a non-executive director at Luxembourg-listed investment group Brait and is the co-founder of its private equity business.

-------------

So what would this mean for the company and punters? I suppose it depends on what instigated this. Was it shareholders pissed off at pressures from other investors and where the company was going? That's quite common in floated companies - read the Richard Branson autobiography for a prime example. Do these particular shareholders still see Betfair as it began, as the punter's friend and a major contrast from the High St bookies they were taking on? Do they disagree with the company's cautious stance re grey markets (pulling out of countries with debatable legislation against bookmakers/exchanges) and want to take the firm back to remove the 'overcompliance' demanded by being a public company? Or do they have such faith in the new Breon Corcoran regime that they see massive potential in the value of the company and based on that, think it is a bargain at the moment?

For the punter, the best option of those above would be if the long-time shareholders were embarrassed by Betfair's current image with the smarter than average punter. The days of loving Betfair as a company are long gone. Betdaq powered by Ladbrokes might have a remote chance of capturing that. Perhaps that prospect of genuine competition for a change has inspired the buyout idea. More than likely, this is existing shareholders thinking (rightly or wrongly) there is still value in the company and wanting to take control of the firm back, rather than allowing the public/hedge funds/any other investors steer an ultra-conservative path.

I imagine we will hear more as this story unravels.

--------------

Mark Davies, one of the founders, posted these thoughts on his blog - very interesting reading...

Thoughts on the Betfair bid

Fantasy Betfair

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

Spot-fixing - you will never, ever be able to stop it

According to this report , IPL tournaments so far have been rife with spot-fixing - that is fixing minor elements of the game - runs in a single over, number of wides bowled etc. The curious part of that article is that the Income Tax department are supposed to have found these crimes. What idiot would be stupid enough to put down 'big wad of cash handed to me by bookie' as a source of income? Backhanders for sportsmen, particularly in a celebrity- and cricket-obsessed culture like India are not rare. They could come from anything like turning up to open someone's new business (not a sponsor, but a 'friend of a friend' arrangement), to being a guest at some devoted fan's dinner party etc. The opportunities are always there, and there will always be people trying to become friends with players and their entourage - that is human nature. This form of match-fixing (and it's not really fixing a match, just a minor element of it) is very hard to prove, but also,

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...