Skip to main content

Betfair to go private again?

Interesting reports emerged over the weekend about the possibility of a buyer for Betfair. It turns out the firm behind it specialise in management takeovers so that sounds like some of the existing shareholders stepping in to buy the firm back, rather than see it continue to look like a lame duck on the public markets.

CVC in talks over Betfair takeover bid

CVC Capital Partners, the owner of Formula One, has held talks about a takeover bid for Betfair, the online gambling exchange.

The private equity firm said on Monday that it had held preliminary discussions with Richard Koch, Antony Ball and partners about Betfair, which could include an offer for the firm by funds advised by CVC together with the two men and partners.

Betfair shares jumped as much as 14pc in early trading in London.

Mr Koch, an author, investor and co-founder of LEK Consulting, holds a 6.9pc stake in Betfair. Mr Ball is a non-executive director at Luxembourg-listed investment group Brait and is the co-founder of its private equity business.

-------------

So what would this mean for the company and punters? I suppose it depends on what instigated this. Was it shareholders pissed off at pressures from other investors and where the company was going? That's quite common in floated companies - read the Richard Branson autobiography for a prime example. Do these particular shareholders still see Betfair as it began, as the punter's friend and a major contrast from the High St bookies they were taking on? Do they disagree with the company's cautious stance re grey markets (pulling out of countries with debatable legislation against bookmakers/exchanges) and want to take the firm back to remove the 'overcompliance' demanded by being a public company? Or do they have such faith in the new Breon Corcoran regime that they see massive potential in the value of the company and based on that, think it is a bargain at the moment?

For the punter, the best option of those above would be if the long-time shareholders were embarrassed by Betfair's current image with the smarter than average punter. The days of loving Betfair as a company are long gone. Betdaq powered by Ladbrokes might have a remote chance of capturing that. Perhaps that prospect of genuine competition for a change has inspired the buyout idea. More than likely, this is existing shareholders thinking (rightly or wrongly) there is still value in the company and wanting to take control of the firm back, rather than allowing the public/hedge funds/any other investors steer an ultra-conservative path.

I imagine we will hear more as this story unravels.

--------------

Mark Davies, one of the founders, posted these thoughts on his blog - very interesting reading...

Thoughts on the Betfair bid

Fantasy Betfair

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…