Skip to main content

French Open preview

Just a short one this time, for the first time in about a decade I haven't been commissioned to write one and time to do a proper one is very scarce at the moment!

The men's top half simply comes down to Djokovic v Nadal, and Rafa wins that nine times out of 10 if fit. Not worth looking any further.

The bottom half is far more interesting. The obvious choices to reach the final or win their respective quarters are Federer and Ferrer but the prices reflect that. Other options:

Berdych - beat Djokovic recently in Rome on the way to the semi-finals, a result matching his record in Madrid. Semi-finalist here in 2010. Tricky opener against Monfils, R4 vs Almagro should be fine (9-3 h2h) but trails Ferrer, his likely QF opponent, 3-7.

Almagro - a double-figure ranking gives an expectation of R4 exit, maybe QF with the right luck. No different this year.

Raonic - already underway with a win over Malisse. Has been coached until recently by a claycourter, so certainly not like a fish out of water on the surface. Would prefer warmer weather to dry up and speed up the courts, likely to face fellow beanpole Kevin Anderson in R3. Big servers/attacking players have had decent results here in the past, Pat Rafter made the semis in the 90s, Martin Verkerk (remember him?) made the final in 2003, but as you see by those dates, it's not that common.

Anderson - similar profile to Raonic, can't see him going any deeper.

Ferrer - obvious selection, no better than evens on Betfair, gets a genuine chance to reach the final this year.

Tsonga - should breeze through this quarter to meet Federer at the end, unless Chardy pulls a cat out of the bag.

Chardy - the wildcard in this section. Reached the quarters in Melbourne, beating del Potro along the way. Clay season not flying so far, but he's the one who can sharply improve.

Monaco - won Dusseldorf last week but not going to threaten here.

Cilic - only 3-4 on clay this season, much better player on hardcourt.

Simon - gutsy win over Hewitt in five sets to kick off, doubt he'll be tested as hard until R4 where he'd taken on Federer.

Benneteau - has won one match in his last eight. R3 here last year was best result for several seasons.

Federer - tailor-made for him to reach the final but he's only reached one final in the past 12 major tournaments. As much as he should have on this bunch, would you really want to back him at odds-on?

If having a bet...
then I'd be backing Berdych at around 3/1 in the third quarter, and a gold coin or two on Chardy at 80/1 with Boylesports. The latter is a bit of a hail Mary, but the kid can really play when he strings it altogether...

Might look at the women's draw a little further into the tournament.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…