Skip to main content

French Open preview

Just a short one this time, for the first time in about a decade I haven't been commissioned to write one and time to do a proper one is very scarce at the moment!

The men's top half simply comes down to Djokovic v Nadal, and Rafa wins that nine times out of 10 if fit. Not worth looking any further.

The bottom half is far more interesting. The obvious choices to reach the final or win their respective quarters are Federer and Ferrer but the prices reflect that. Other options:

Berdych - beat Djokovic recently in Rome on the way to the semi-finals, a result matching his record in Madrid. Semi-finalist here in 2010. Tricky opener against Monfils, R4 vs Almagro should be fine (9-3 h2h) but trails Ferrer, his likely QF opponent, 3-7.

Almagro - a double-figure ranking gives an expectation of R4 exit, maybe QF with the right luck. No different this year.

Raonic - already underway with a win over Malisse. Has been coached until recently by a claycourter, so certainly not like a fish out of water on the surface. Would prefer warmer weather to dry up and speed up the courts, likely to face fellow beanpole Kevin Anderson in R3. Big servers/attacking players have had decent results here in the past, Pat Rafter made the semis in the 90s, Martin Verkerk (remember him?) made the final in 2003, but as you see by those dates, it's not that common.

Anderson - similar profile to Raonic, can't see him going any deeper.

Ferrer - obvious selection, no better than evens on Betfair, gets a genuine chance to reach the final this year.

Tsonga - should breeze through this quarter to meet Federer at the end, unless Chardy pulls a cat out of the bag.

Chardy - the wildcard in this section. Reached the quarters in Melbourne, beating del Potro along the way. Clay season not flying so far, but he's the one who can sharply improve.

Monaco - won Dusseldorf last week but not going to threaten here.

Cilic - only 3-4 on clay this season, much better player on hardcourt.

Simon - gutsy win over Hewitt in five sets to kick off, doubt he'll be tested as hard until R4 where he'd taken on Federer.

Benneteau - has won one match in his last eight. R3 here last year was best result for several seasons.

Federer - tailor-made for him to reach the final but he's only reached one final in the past 12 major tournaments. As much as he should have on this bunch, would you really want to back him at odds-on?

If having a bet...
then I'd be backing Berdych at around 3/1 in the third quarter, and a gold coin or two on Chardy at 80/1 with Boylesports. The latter is a bit of a hail Mary, but the kid can really play when he strings it altogether...

Might look at the women's draw a little further into the tournament.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

The Cup review

James McDonald feels the emotion of winning the Melbourne Cup on Verry Elleegant. (photo credit Darrian Traynor/Getty Images) With every man and his dog doing Cup previews these days, perhaps a postmortem of the race provides more value - at least for these more serious about the game or want something to refer back to in 363 days' time. It was great to see Flemington basking in the warm spring sun, with no threat of rain which buggers up the confidence you have in the state of the track, an integral part of betting on horses. The crowd was back, at least about 10% of the normal Cup day crowd, but 10,000 more than were allowed last year. Let us never have to deal with these restrictions again in our lifetimes. The TV coverage - well, um, ugh. On Derby Day, I was able to watch the racing.com stream in the UK while Sky Sports Racing kept to their normal NSW-controlled Sky Racing Aus coverage which denies that Victoria and South Australia exist. For Cup Day, they switched to the Chann