Skip to main content

Wimbledon preview - men

The committee at the All-England Club made the bizarre decision last week not to upgrade the seeding of a former champion and long-time world no.1 over a player with one quarter-final appearance here in 10 years. Oh, he'd won the rubbish grass tournament at s'Hertogenbosch before so that's more important. What a farce. Or was it a failed attempt by the club to produce a soft draw for Andy Murray? After all, either he or Djokovic had to be the beneficiary... Anyway, we now have Djokovic trading at evens with most bookies which spoils much of the fun.

1. Djokovic - as mentioned above, gets the very soft draw. Might face Haas in R3, Gasquet or Berdych R4, and Ferrer/Dolgopolov/Nishikori/Dimitrov/del Potro in the semi-final. Biggest risk for him is that he doesn't get a hard enough test before the final. Only injury will stop him playing on Sunday week.

2. Murray - on the harder side of the draw but only has to face 'one' of Federer and Nadal in the semi before a likely final against Djokovic. That is, of course, assuming he gets past Tsonga in the quarters. In good nick after winning at Queen's, and curiously, it looks like he will play three of those opponents again here. I reckon he can win the lot but his price is higher because of the harder draw.

3. Federer - wrote him off a few years ago re winning another Slam and proved me to be the fool this time last year. This time, he'll have to beat Nadal, Murray and Djokovic to win the title. Reckon I'm fairly safe to say it can't be done unless he gets breaks in the draw.

4. Ferrer - ridiculous that he is seeded four here and that he has copped a very soft quarter to boot. His biggest scalp ever here has been del Potro who was seeded ninth last year. No guarantee he gets through this section though, Dolgopolov, Kohlschreiber, Nishikori, Dimitrov and del Potro all have a shot to again deny him the complete set of Slam semi-finals.

5. Nadal - has been tuning up in the Hurlingham exhibition, can't see him having too many worries before a QF clash with Federer. Never doubt the ability of Nadal to string big wins together.

6. Tsonga - forever touted as the danger outside the big four and has made successive semi-finals here. Would need to beat Murray to stretch that run to three but hasn't beaten the Scot since 2008, with a record of 2-8. Worth noting in four of the five times he has faced Murray on grass, he has won the first set.

7. Berdych - finalist here back in 2010 but also bombed out R1 last year. That sums him up really. Needs to overcome a 2-13 record against Djokovic to get any further than the quarters.

8. del Potro - gets the 'soft' quarter and has his chance of winning it. But he could also go as early as R3 against Dimitrov. Never past R4 here, that's his level on grass.

That's it for winning chances, and probably three more than I needed to write up.

Not keen on an early bet, I like Murray this year but since he'll be odds-against in the final anyway, I don't see any great rush to get on him early and take all the risk that goes with it.

Murray to win but worry about betting on him late in the second week.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

Betdaq.... sold...... FOR HOW MUCH???

So as rumoured for a while, Ladbrokes have finally acquired the lemon, sorry, purple-coloured betting exchange, Betdaq. For a mind-boggling €30m as 'initial consideration'. That's an even more ridiculous price than Fernando Torres for £50m, or any English player Liverpool have purchased in recent seasons! As I've written previously there are no logical business reasons for this acquisition. from Nov 29, 2012 The Racing Post reported this week that Ladbrokes are nearing a decision to acquire Betdaq. This baffles me, it really does. Betdaq are a complete and utter lemon. Their only rival in the market has kicked so many own goals over the years with the premium charge, followed by an increase in the premium charge, cost of API and data use, customer service standards which have fallen faster than Facebook share value, site crashes and various other faults. So many pissed off Betfair customers, yet Betdaq are still tailed off with a lap to go. Around the world, Betfair

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...