Skip to main content

Betfred Mile preview

Day four of Glorious Goodwood, day five of Galway... how's that punting bank going? Friday's card on the South Downs is a cracker with plenty of black type racing and classy handicaps. First preview of the day goes to Stephen Keene, @untilnextyear, with his look at the Betfred Mile.


The Betfred Mile

The Betfred Mile, formerly the Golden Mile, has to be one of the most intriguing betting heats of the week. There is nothing like a big handicap to get your head around and there are a number of clues and angles to explore in this particular race. There are some strong trends, some potentially very well-handicapped horses and a fair few question marks. Working your way through a race like this is a bit like tackling a cryptic crossword – it is sure to get the old brain cells going, is sure to be frustrating at times, and is sure to be an incredibly satisfying experience if you get things right. By the same token, it might be like a cryptic crossword in that by the end of it you’ll think you’ve completely wasted your time!

Anyway, let’s see if we can narrow things down. Big handicaps at the major meetings generally have some notable trends as the same sorts of horses win the same sorts of races each year. While it is no good following any trend blindly, looking at them with a critical eye can certainly help us get a feel for what sort of horse might win the race.

The real standout trend relates to the draw. Generally speaking, with the turn of the track and the way the race is run, a horse needs a single-figure draw. While there has been the odd winner and a few placed horses running from a high draw it is clear a low draw is a significant advantage, particularly for horses who like to run more prominently. This makes Spa’s Dancer, Windhoek, Fireship, Captain Bertie and St Moritz very interesting runners.

However, the market is wise to the draw bias and so this isn’t necessarily the place to find a big-priced winner. This year there are also a fair few low-drawn horses who are happier being held-up, which might alter the dynamics of the race and give the rest of the field a shout. Any further rain and softer ground could also change how the race is run. So, as tempting as it would be to rule out any horse drawn in a double-figure stall, we might be missing a trick, and a big price.

Progressive form has been a bonus in this race, so Wentworth and Haafaguinea are worth a second look in particular, although all the three year-olds are worth a glance. Generally speaking, older horses don’t have a great record in the race, with only one six year-old winner in the last ten years. And we really want a horse with some sort of form – ideally finishing in the first six last time out.

Unfortunately, all of this doesn’t really narrow down the field enough – but it does give us a reasonable framework to work with once we’ve identified who might be well-handicapped.

Dance and Dance and St Moritz look very well-handicapped on their old form. Sirius Prospect, Field of Dream, Set The Trend, Windhoek and Fireship don’t look weighted out of it either. Looking from a speed rating perspective there are multiple horses who on current form could outrun their mark, but Sirius Prospect, Field of Dream, Set The Trend, Dance and Dance and St Moritz are the horses that look to be ahead of the handicapper according to their last speed rating, as well as seeming pretty well-handicapped on past form.

So, let’s take a look at those five. Sirius Prospect and Field of Dream are poorly drawn, but as horses that can be held up that might not be the end of the world. They’ve also got solid recent form, winning decent races. I think there is no harm in having some small savers on these two, as they could easily pick up the pieces should the race fall apart.

Set The Trend is badly drawn and perhaps too old to win, so I’m going to rule him out.

Dance and Dance is well-drawn, but might not be able to make the most of the draw with his favoured running style. With the draw and Ryan Moore on board the price is a little skinny. I’m also a little worried that Dance and Dance is a bit of a “nearly” horse, who keeps running into trouble and having hard-luck stories and just can’t get the win. I wouldn’t put anyone off having a bet on him though, as he probably is the most likely winner, if not the best value.

This leaves us with St Moritz. He might be too old at seven. But he is incredibly well-drawn, can front-run and as a recent recruit to the David O’Meara yard is fascinating. O’Meara has a knack of bringing the best out of tired horses, and it can take a couple of runs to do so. While St Moritz hasn’t tackled Goodwood before, he has placed at Epsom, which suggests the undulating track won’t be a problem. With Paul Hanagan on board I’m willing to take a chance here as we could have a horse that is not only well-handicapped, but also has the potential to improve above and beyond what we might expect too.


Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

The Cup review

James McDonald feels the emotion of winning the Melbourne Cup on Verry Elleegant. (photo credit Darrian Traynor/Getty Images) With every man and his dog doing Cup previews these days, perhaps a postmortem of the race provides more value - at least for these more serious about the game or want something to refer back to in 363 days' time. It was great to see Flemington basking in the warm spring sun, with no threat of rain which buggers up the confidence you have in the state of the track, an integral part of betting on horses. The crowd was back, at least about 10% of the normal Cup day crowd, but 10,000 more than were allowed last year. Let us never have to deal with these restrictions again in our lifetimes. The TV coverage - well, um, ugh. On Derby Day, I was able to watch the stream in the UK while Sky Sports Racing kept to their normal NSW-controlled Sky Racing Aus coverage which denies that Victoria and South Australia exist. For Cup Day, they switched to the Chann