Skip to main content

Ladbrokes set to enter Australia with a big coup in store

Most of us were caught out by the news today that Ladbrokes have bought into the Australian betting market, acquiring local firm Bookmaker.com.au for around £13m (AUD22m). The website was only created in February 2012 by Queensland bookmaker Dean Shannon and is reported to have taken over $400m in bets since opening. (Note to UK online bookies - this is called 'old school bookmaking', actually laying a bet). Along with the bookie client list though, there are some other assets of value involved in this sale - according to Bookmakers Review, an affiliate network of approximately 3000 sites focused almost exclusively on racing, and a very impressive website which several innovative features tailored to the Australian market, but could easily be adapted for wider use with Ladbrokes.

This is an interesting entry point for Ladbrokes - it's been well publicised they have been sniffing around looking for a firm to buy into the Aussie market. They looked at the Victorian tote licence, they will have courted Tom Waterhouse, Centrebet and just about every other firm with an Australian licence. Several European firms have looked closely at BetEzy and everyone of them has run for the hills when they've seen the books. Betstar are still holding out - is it really a good idea to refuse the millions being thrown around by international firms? Perhaps Alan Eskander doesn't want to spend the rest of his life on a golf course spending the sale money... Betfred seem to be going it alone in Australia (too late she cried?) and Bwin are still floating around - the market isn't settled yet.

I've heard comments that if Bookmaker.com.au is worth $22m, then Tom Waterhouse went way too cheaply at up to $110m based on performance. I don't necessarily agree - Waterhouse sold his online operation. There is nothing particularly special about his website and his 'success' has been based on very expensive PR campaigns. By all reports, that meant his books weren't in the black. Was there an intricate network of affiliate sites driving significant traffic to his site? Not that I am aware of. The Sydney press lapped up the quotes of the company being worth up to $500m but they were purely fantasy, trying to drive up the price. As George Constanza said "It's only a lie if you don't believe it...". By purchasing Dean Shannon's firm, Ladbrokes can have yet another crack at creating a decent website. Their online results lag further behind their rivals than a four-mile chaser in a 1000m sprint and in the last year they've done deals with Betdaq, Playtech and now Bookmaker.com.au, heavily focusing on the technology. Throw enough darts and one might eventually hit the board....

The big rumour though is who they plan to run the operation. Ladbrokes PLC is a company under the pump, CEO Richard Glynn isn't making the investors happy and they have just announced even more redundancies at head office. Sources are telling me that Dean Shannon and the current management will remain in charge for the time being but former Sportsbet CEO Matt Tripp is lined up to take over in 2014. Tripp has the canny knack of being in the right place at the right time in the Australian betting industry. Selling the family business No.1 Betting Shop to Sportingbet and moving it to Darwin. Using the profit from that to buy Sportsbet, the original Australian sports bookmaker set up by Bryan Clark back in the 80s, but had then changed hands a few times and was really in poor shape when he came in with a management team buyout, in 2005. Six years later it was a huge business and along came Paddy Power with a huge cheque book to buy the firm. Once the handover done, he then took over as chairman rather than sitting out with no-compete clauses. He left that position earlier in the year with the former CEO of Racing Victoria Ltd, Rob Hines, moving onto the Sportsbet board, so the rumour mill has been working overtime about where Tripp might pop up next.

If it is correct, then it's the biggest goal Ladbrokes have kicked for a long time. Tripp is the Messi of the local industry, if anyone can turn a relatively small, Norfolk Island-licensed online betting operation into something befitting of one of the biggest names in the bookmaking industry, it's him....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…