Skip to main content

Long Walk Hurdle preview

It might be Christmas time with racing winding down until it gets serious again on Boxing Day, but there's a decent G1 at Ascot tomorrow in the Long Walk Hurdle. Regular contributor Jon da Silva, @CreamOnTop, is never afraid to have an opinion....

--------------------------------------------

WESSEX YOUTH TRUST LONG WALK HURDLE

Assuming the Wessex Youth Trust did not put up money it does show the power of Ascot to fund a Grade 1 race. Of course the Youth Trust is the official charity of the renamed Prince Edward now the Duke of Wessex - one assumes for similar reasons to Windscale being renamed Sellafield, nuclear mishap after nuclear mishap still at least he did not marry Fergie or that mentalist Spencer.

I believe this race is the most stamina sapping Grade 1 in the calendar more so than the Stayers AKA World Hurdle which cut from 3m 2f to 3 miles when it changed courses at Cheltenham and some dodgy stayers have won/nearly won that. Ascot's last mile whilst not as steep as Cheltenham's final 2F is against the collar with no lung-filling breather.

At Fishers Cross 8/15
One of those who has been adopted by the National Hunt fans cos he won a novice race at the Cheltenham festival - see Michael Owen in football make a splash at 18 and never get any better and no one notices, sadly in racing people notice as your record lacks 1s. He's good and looked like being at least 2nd to Celestial Halo when landing awkwardly having bucked in the air (Quit?). The prevailing assumption he would have won last time but for the mistake seemed to me fanciful as Celestial Halo had a ton left and would be the faster horse. OR 161. The Pretender.

Reve de Sivola 7/2
Reve was well beaten at pan-flat Newbury by Celestial Halo and would also have been well beaten by At Fishers Cross (AFC) too but for that one's error. Off the bit the whole way it seemed in the World Hurdle in 4th behind a Solwhit/Celestial Halo 1 2. On heavy ground he strolled in 14 wickets clear of Smad Place (3rd in that World Hurdle) here last year. Chance really determined by the ground for me and needs most of the 26 furlongs. OR 160. The Holder.

Salubrious 9/1
Second last week in the Relkeel Hurdle. Prior ran well in a handicap and up to OR 153. No obvious reason for him to improve for further based on form. Beaten 6L over 19F at Newbury by AFC and 7.5L over 21F at Newbury by African Gold (2nd to AFC at Chel). May get run of the race up front but would require improvement (8 pounds on Official Ratings with AFC) or an under perform by the front 2 (possible) and had a hard slog last week to boot.

Time For Rupert 12/1
Been off a year and a half and chasing prior. Breaks blood vessels. However when a hurdler would have had some chance here having been beaten 5L by Mudlark Tidal Bay in the Cleeve and 3.5 into 2nd in the World Hurdle by Big Buck's both of whom might be fav here (BB certainly). You can make a case for him but it's been a long time since he showed top class form in any discipline. Beating The Giant Bolster on a flat track in retrospect did not make him a Gold Cup contender.

Sidebar: What a shame Tidal Bay never faced Big Buck's on soft/heavy ground OK BB likely have won but it would have been 2 furlongs to the rest.

Tweedledrum Any Price You Like
This horse has no chance and has been entered for prize-money and if he picks off something that tries to win or there is a non runner the 2 grand guaranteed goes to 4 grand. Entered elsewhere to boot.

Conclusion

There is a chance AFC is the dog's bollocks still and would have beaten the selection hollow at Newbury if he had not jumped one badly. Salubrious would have some sort of chance but I suspect a lot of use will be made of Reve here and there will be no advantage to a front runner. Time for Rupert returns and with his bleeding and physical problems is probably best caught first time up (it's not necessarily a great training performance when they win off breaks - following up is the training performance!).

However this is the race that should bring out the best in Reve de Sivola and the form of his win last year is the best on offer. Poor runs since would mostly be when speed was needed and this is his patch.

2 pts Reve de Sivola 7/2 (on my 1pt or 2pt scale yes I bet like a Limit Poker game)

Comments

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…