Skip to main content

today's Vlahos/Ponzi/BC3 update

Another day, another roundup of the Vlahos debacle...

Racing identity Bill Vlahos' emails reveal fear of attack, and warn of club collapse

It seems Billy has had troubling paying out for many months, since the start of 2013. Apparently this came from boasting about exorbitant returns (46% profit) in the last quarter of 2012. Rather than serving as a great advertisement to the scheme to bring in more members, all it did was encourage existing members to start enjoying the benefits of their new-found wealth, thus creating a major cash flow problem for the fund. And then the slow pay went on, and on, and on, throughout the year. One of his many excuses was they were now 'having difficulty placing their bets' and 'big mouths have made it hard for us again'. No wonder he moved to Singapore for several months - in a top end luxury hotel no less!

Then Billy got desperate, the ego couldn't be stopped. He had to find the missing money, so he was in discussions with a Michigan-based funding group for a loan of around US$178m. This just sounded like a massive sum of money when I first read that article, but listening to Andrew Rule's interview on RSN Sports Radio this morning...lo and behold, what does US$178m equate to? Something very close to AU$194m... now where have we seen that number before...? The Michigan firm will be thanking their lucky stars they didn't press the button on that loan. If it was due diligence that halted the deal, then those guys should be rewarded with massive bonuses - their firm probably would have gone bust without it...

By November 20, i.e. the end of the spring carnival, there was nothing left to salvage, hence the ''I WANT THIS TO BE OVER,'' he told club members in an emotional email.

----

Once upon a time I was very active on internet forums, now I just do it all on Twitter. Unfortunately that meant I missed a thread like this:

The Edge

Some punters on that thread can hold their heads high, others will look back and cringe at their own naivety.

------

Fraud squad detectives are now getting involved, and very interested in whether Vlahos has been destroying evidence.

Vlahos gets police 'please explain' over bashing and missing $194m

According to News Ltd journalist Andrew Rule, there are some long-serving policemen who have been stung as investors - do you reckon they might go that extra yard to crucify him?

------

The town of Yarrawonga will suffer the effects of this for a long, long time. Not only having lost so much money, but also having most of the nation look at them as "Australia's Most Gullible". Footy clubs now have to make public statements to deny involvement...

Yarrawonga Pigeons distance themselves from Vlahos' failed syndicate

------

What about the horses a few people have asked? Inglis have removed at least eight horses from the BC3 Connewarre property. Inglis CEO Mark Webster said it wasn't about reclaiming unpaid thoroughbreds but in concern for their welfare. Debts for yearlings are not uncommon, the sales firm holds the registration papers for each horse until such time as they are fully paid for, so there was no chance of 'Jimmy' running in a race or official trial or even being named before that took place. Whether 'Jimmy' is part of that group of horses, or even his current health is unknown.

Comments

  1. Is it true BC3 tried to poison Jimmy to claim the insurance money?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't know for certain yet Zepp, but my market would have it odds-on....

      Delete

Post a Comment

Thanks for your comments, but if you're a spammer, you've just wasted your time - it won't get posted.

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…