Skip to main content

A plug for a great cycling tipping service

Year on year Wheeliebets (www.wheeliebets.com) continues to improve its service and the results are obvious. Massive returns on investments compared to other tipsters not only in cycling but across other mainstream sports.

Not only is Wheeliebets the least expensive professional cycling service, it's also the longest standing with results backed up and independently verified. You can have confidence in a service that provides direct tipping to your phone, an in-play service, a free-to-view blog with previews of all races as well as the premium inside knowledge of those on the professional circuit.

Let's see can we beat our numbers from last year as shown hereunder

Points Staked 683

Points Returned 898

Annual Profit in Points 215

Annual Return on Investment - 134% (Returns/Stake) - that's based on a season of 9 months

A Euro per point on all bets made you €215 overall, think about that - imagine you had a tenner per point on.........

For £25 per month, it makes sense to subscribe.

See results from 2014 here

DISCLAIMER - in return for this post I receive the service at a substantial discount. I believe it is a great service because it is a niche sport where expertise and hard work into the research pays off, subscribers learn a lot from the previews alone and the service is comprehensive. And most importantly, it is profitable!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

Betdaq.... sold...... FOR HOW MUCH???

So as rumoured for a while, Ladbrokes have finally acquired the lemon, sorry, purple-coloured betting exchange, Betdaq. For a mind-boggling €30m as 'initial consideration'. That's an even more ridiculous price than Fernando Torres for £50m, or any English player Liverpool have purchased in recent seasons! As I've written previously there are no logical business reasons for this acquisition. from Nov 29, 2012 The Racing Post reported this week that Ladbrokes are nearing a decision to acquire Betdaq. This baffles me, it really does. Betdaq are a complete and utter lemon. Their only rival in the market has kicked so many own goals over the years with the premium charge, followed by an increase in the premium charge, cost of API and data use, customer service standards which have fallen faster than Facebook share value, site crashes and various other faults. So many pissed off Betfair customers, yet Betdaq are still tailed off with a lap to go. Around the world, Betfair

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...