Skip to main content

Business insurance based on sporting results

Last year during the Rugby World Cup, a few people with little understanding of modern business practices were surprised to learn that nations such as Australia had 'bet' on their success by way of sports insurance firms. This is very common in professional sport with virtually every athlete having some type of performance bonus in their contract. Win a tournament, break into the top 10, qualify for the Champions League etc. - sometimes they are personal bonuses, other times they are major windfalls for the club. Imagine how much Chelsea money will 'lose', or more correctly, not receive, from not qualifying for Europe this season. Accountants run businesses these days, and they hate volatility. Just look at bookmakers moaning about results. The actual bookmakers understand this is part and parcel of the betting industry, but the bean counters and shareholders despise them.

This not only affects players and clubs, but sponsors and businesses linked to the sport. Danny Willett's sponsors would have received great exposure out of his recent Masters win, but it's highly likely they had to stump up a big wad of cash to the player as well, as part of a performance-loaded contract. One contract bonus deal which did hit the headlines was Lance Armstrong vs. SCA Promotions. Armstrong's contract was loaded with bonuses if he won the Tour de France, and his team had to insure the bonuses, as per his contract. The insurance firm refused to pay out, citing evidence that Armstrong had doped. Armstrong took SCA to court and won, the first time around. Once Armstrong was exposed for being a serial cheat by USADA, SCA returned fire and got their money back. They are several of these sports insurance firms around, but unless you are involved in the trade, it's unlikely you'd have heard of them. You will have heard of Wimbledon having rain insurance during The Championships, and retailers such as Curry's paying bonuses to customers depending on the success of England at the World Cup. These are sports insurance deals; it's nothing new but it is starting to have wider ramifications in the business community.

Imagine you own a pub this summer and most of your business is during live sport, particularly football. How much do you think your revenue would differ for the month of the tournament between England making the final and England bombing out in the group stage? It'd be a massive variance and you'd have already committed to the overheads - TV and sound upgrades, decorations, promotions etc., before considering the staff costs, which you might be able to minimise.

Siepe Sports allows businesses to insure their event-based trade against poor performance, and thus loss of revenue, by paying a premium.

From Inapub magazine, April edition, p46.



Don't be caught out by circumstances you can't control, insure your business against poor England sporting performances and keep your accountant happy!

For information, the founder of Siepe Sports is a close friend of the author and no sponsorship benefits have been received in return for this post

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T