Skip to main content

Newcastle Friday Apr 14 2yo race review

Newcastle 2yo Friday Apr 14 1.50
Fillies' Conditions Stakes
5f, Class 2, 1m2.36s
(slow by 4.36s)

Cheeseandpickle, Feb 11. £26k yearling. Becomes the eighth winner of 11 foals from a ten-start maiden mare. One of the oldest in this field. Smart Scottish stable with strong 2yo record, started favourite. Parked behind the leader under a nice hold. Worked around her when that horse didn't accelerate, took control 1f out and hung on to win without full exertion. Scope for more but RPR figure third-weakest of juvenile races so far.

Thrifty, Feb 22. Passed in for 2800gns as a foal. Dam won her only race in her final start (20th) despite earning a cheque in eight of first nine races. Top rating of 76, but won off 45. Fourth foal to date, only winner has won three of 40 starts. Settled midfield about a length and a half behind Cheeseandpickle, went right when winner went left to find the gap, outpaced and then worked home to be beaten similar margin. Trainer has only three placegetters from 38 2yo AW runners in past five seasons. May not mean a lot as this race was more valuable than the usual AW race.

Marsh Storm, Mar 13. €38k foal, €30k buyback by vendor as yearling. Trainer has had 90 runners in 2017, and remarkably all his winners have been 3yo on AW. All his 2yo starters have been placed. Settled behind the lead nearest the outside rail, with plenty of space. Under riding at halfway, took a while for the penny to drop. Stayed on last furlong to claim third.

Fas Le Fios, Feb 19. Had the benefit of a previous start in France where he finished six lengths behind the unplaced Quick Skips Lad who also has British form. Up on the speed, outpaced at the furlong, plugged on OK. Unwanted in the betting, so performed better than expected.

Controversial Lady, Feb 26. Second run in five days. Urged along early to sit very handy to the pace. Under pressure before halfway, last at the 2f. Stayed on OK through the field to claim fifth.

Peace Prevails, Mar 5. Vendor buyback for £20k as yearling, second foal of mare who won once from 10 starts (over a mile on Polytrack), peaking at OR74. Sat near the pace, closest to inside rail. Every chance, run lasted about five strides when asked for more at the 2f. Started 4/1, showed little to justify that.

Kheleyf's Girl, Feb 9. Eight day backup after running close second in that weak Southwell race. Stepped to the front, then asked to go at the 2f. Found nothing, disappointing for punters who expected to cash in on her experience.

Nsnas Alward, Feb 15. Vendor buyback for 10k gns as yearling, dam won over 1m4f in France so likely to be better with distance. Went forward to lead, looked comfortable but then found zero when pressured 1.5f out. May be better learning to settle and run home late.

Time for Treacle, Mar 13. From terrible mare who had eleven starts, couldn't win off OR45 and earned less than a grand. SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BREED. Under pressure to keep up after a furlong and was gone by the 2f pole. Useless.

Winner might be decent but figures ordinary.


Popular posts from this blog

It's all gone Pete Tong at Betfair!

The Christmas Hurdle from Leopardstown, a good Grade 2 race during the holiday period. But now it will go into history as the race which brought Betfair down. Over £21m at odds of 29 available on Voler La Vedette in-running - that's a potential liability of over £500m. You might think that's a bit suspicious, something's fishy, especially with the horse starting at a Betfair SP of 2.96. Well, this wasn't a horse being stopped by a jockey either - the bloody horse won! Look at what was matched at 29. Split that in half and multiply by 28 for the actual liability for the layer(s). (Matched amounts always shown as double the backers' stake, never counts the layers' risk). There's no way a Betfair client would have £600m+ in their account. Maybe £20 or even £50m from the massive syndicates who regard(ed) Betfair as safer than any bank, but not £600m. So the error has to be something technical. However, rumour has it, a helpdesk reply (not gospel, natur

What shits me about match-fixing 'journalism'.

The anti-wagering media bandwagon has dozens of new members this week, all weighing in an industry they have absolutely no idea about. I'm all for getting the betting industry into the mainstream but it shits me no end when they roll out reports and celebrities who simply don't have a clue what they are talking about and don't bother to check basic facts which key arguments in their story. If this was the financial industry, making errors like this would have them in all sorts of trouble, but the same level of regulation doesn't apply because finance stock markets are supposedly all legitimate and serious, whereas sports betting is just a bit of fun for people who can never win in the long-term... according to the media. This week we have seen the sting by the Telegraph which, on the face of it, looks to be a tremendous piece of investigative work into fixing in English football. But the headlines around it are over-sensationalised yet again. Delroy Facey, a former pla

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term ' Ponzi scheme ' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up. So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done. T