Skip to main content

Breeders Cup Classic preview

And the grand finale of the 2017 Breeders Cup meeting is the Classic. Can Arrogate go back-to-back and restore his reputation as the best horse in the world, or will his career just fizzle out?

International racing aficionado and legendary racecaller of the future, Luke Humphreys, @WorldRacingLuke, takes the reins...

==============================

Breeders’ Cup Classic
Group 1, US$5,000,000 2000m
Del Mar 1230 BST, 1135 AEST
ODDS LISTED ARE BEST AVAILABLE (THURSDAY AFTERNOON)

1 Arrogate (11/4): Obviously one of the very best horses in the world at his best but obviously question marks about whether he likes this track or not or whether he is at his best or not. Absolutely sensational victories in this last year and the Dubai World Cup in March but beaten twice subsequently, last time over C&D at G1 level. Question marks.

2 War Decree (50/1): Argubly a career best to win European trial race for this at Dundalk at G3 level last time by two and a quarter lengths. Beaten two and a half in the G1 Prix du Jockey Club prior to that, sire was a good horse on dirt, dam’s sire won the showpiece event in Dubai. Better dirt pedigree than the stable mate. Was one of the favourites for the classics at one point.

3 Win The Space (100/1): Career best when length and three quarter third to Mubtaahij in the G1 Awesome Again last time when never nearer. 100/1 is overs on that run, but ordinary form prior.

4 War Story (100/1): 12f G2 winner in New York three back, well beaten by Gun Runner the last two times.

5 Gun Runner (2/1): Gets his chance for a huge race G1 success. Beaten twice by Arrogate into third in last year’s Travers and into second in Dubai in March. With questions around him though, and this one winning his last three G1s by an added up 22 ¾ lengths, he gets his best chance to beat him.

6 Mubtaahij (33/1): 33/1 looks overs considering he is a G1 winner last time and has held his own in Dubai at this level. Can run into a place for sure.
7 Churchill (25/1): Three votes to Aidan O’Brien for putting him in the race, as he tries to finally win the race. But the horse’s form I’m afraid is not as good as what is was earlier in the season and his stablemate seems more of a dirt horse on pedigree. Would love to see him win, and can do so if at his best, but not sure I can see it happening.
8 West Coast (6/1): Gets better and better and has won his last two at G1 level by an added up 10 ½ lengths. However Mike Smith favours Arrogate, Javier Castellano gets the leg-up.

9 Gunnevera 
(50/1): Has just on three lengths to find with West Coast after finishing second to him in the Travers, hard to see him doing that.

10 Pavel
(50/1): Just lost out on second in the G1 Jockey Club Gold Cup last time at Belmont, not the strongest renewal of that feature though.

11 Collected (7/1): Unbeaten this season from four, from a mile to 10f winning by three and three quarter lengths, twice, 14 lengths, and defeating Arrogate by a half in the Pacific Classic last time, drawn wide but primed for this.

Ratings: (11) COLLECTED - (5) GUN RUNNER - (1) ARROGATE - (8) WEST COAST - (6) MUBTAAHIJ – (7) CHURCHILL - (2) WAR DECREE - (9) GUNNEVERA - (10) PAVEL - (4) WAR STORY


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

lay the field - my favourite racing strategy

Dabbling with laying the field in-running at various prices today, not just one price, but several in the same race. Got several matched in the previous race at Brighton, then this race came along at Nottingham. Such a long straight at Nottingham makes punters often over-react and think the finish line is closer than it actually is. As you can see by the number of bets matched, there was plenty of volatility in this in-play market. It's rare you'll get a complete wipe-out with one horse getting matched at all levels, but it can happen, so don't give yourself too much risk...

Racing has a Ponzi scheme - and the fallout will be enormous

When the term 'Ponzi scheme' is mentioned these days, the names Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford instantly spring to mind. The pair of them ran multi-billion dollar frauds (US$60bn and $8bn respectively) that destroyed the lives of thousands of investors who had put their life savings into a 'wonderful' investment strategy. How so many people were sucked into the scheme is baffling to those on the outside. The lifestyle, the sales pitch, the success stories of the early investors - I suppose it all adds up.

So where does this link to racing you ask? A prominent Australian 'racing identity' this week has been reported to have lost access to a bank account with punters' club funds of $194m in it. Firstly - is there a worse term for anyone to be labelled with that 'racing identity'? It ALWAYS ends up meaning shonky crook! Secondly - who the hell has a punters' club with an active bankroll in the tens of millions? It simply can't be done.

The…

damage control when trading goals

When trades go bad, some people will say cut your losses immediately, others will recommend having a bit of patience as events tend to level out (i.e. games with two goals in the first 10 mins never end up with 18 goals in 90 minutes). This is something I like to do on certain matches.

Background:
1. You've backed Under 2.5 goals, trying to nick a few ticks at a time as the clock ticks.
2. You've been caught out by a goal.
3. The market has gone sharply against you.

On this particular match from a couple of weeks ago, there was an early goal (sixth minute) before I got involved. The period immediately after an early goal regularly shows a sharp drop in the Under price, so I was trying to capitalise on that. But Watford then scored again after 14 minutes. The Back price I took (3.95) was now out to 12 - I could close out for a big loss (not my style) or wait and wait for the price to come back to somewhere I could close out for minimal damage. But at 2-0 after 15 minutes, it w…